University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, P. O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Center of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Sep;28(3):475-485. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9723-0.
Purpose To assess repeatability and safety of the functional capacity evaluation-one-handed (FCE-OH), a FCE-OH individuals, consisting of eight items. Method The FCE-OH protocol was administered twice to 23 individuals with upper limb absence (87% male; median age 46 years; median 2 days between sessions). To examine repeatability, test-retest reliability and agreement were assessed with the intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA), respectively. Reliability was considered acceptable when ICC-values were ≥0.75. Widths of LoA of four tests were compared with those of healthy adults. Safety and pain response were assessed with a questionnaire. Results After controlling for stability of construct, ICC-values ranged between 0.23 and 0.96, and widths of LoA ranged between 16 and 79%. Intertrial (learning) effects were present in three test items. No serious adverse reactions were reported. A pain response was reported by 30% of the participants. Conclusion Good or excellent reliability was observed in five tests, while three items showed poor or moderate test-retest reliability. Interpretation of agreement was possible for four tests, of which three showed widths of LoA similar to those reported in healthy adults. Learning effects were present; therefore, interpretation at the individual level should be performed with care. As the CI of several items were wide, confirmation of results in a larger sample is warranted. Safety was confirmed.
目的 评估功能性能力评估单手(FCE-OH)的重复性和安全性,FCE-OH 个体由八项组成。
方法 将 FCE-OH 方案两次施用于 23 名上肢缺失者(87%为男性;中位年龄 46 岁;两次测试之间的中位时间为 2 天)。为了评估重复性,使用组内相关系数(ICC)和可接受限(LoA)分别评估了测试-再测试的可靠性和一致性。当 ICC 值≥0.75 时,认为可靠性可接受。将四个测试的 LoA 宽度与健康成年人进行了比较。使用问卷评估安全性和疼痛反应。
结果 在控制结构稳定性后,ICC 值范围为 0.23 至 0.96,LoA 宽度范围为 16 至 79%。三个测试项目存在试验间(学习)效应。没有报告严重的不良反应。30%的参与者报告了疼痛反应。
结论 在五项测试中观察到了良好或优秀的可靠性,而在三项测试中观察到了较差或中等的测试-再测试可靠性。四个测试的一致性可进行解读,其中三个测试的 LoA 宽度与健康成年人相似。存在学习效应,因此应谨慎进行个体水平的解读。由于几个项目的置信区间较宽,因此需要在更大的样本中确认结果。安全性得到确认。