Soer Remko, van der Schans Cees P, Geertzen Jan H, Groothoff Johan W, Brouwer Sandra, Dijkstra Pieter U, Reneman Michiel F
Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.008.
Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Reneman MF. Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation.
To establish normative values for a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) of healthy working subjects.
Descriptive.
Rehabilitation center.
Healthy working subjects (N=701; 448 men, 253 women) between 20 and 60 years of age, working in more than 180 occupations.
Subjects performed a 2-hour FCE consisting of 12 work-related tests. Subjects were classified into categories based on physical demands according to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.
Means, ranges, SDs, and percentiles were provided for normative values of FCE, and a regression analysis for outcome of the 12 tests was performed.
Normative FCE values were established for 4 physical demand categories.
The normative values enable comparison of patients' performances to these values. If a patient's performance exceeds the lowest scores in his/her corresponding demand category, then the patient's capacity is very likely to be sufficient to meet the workload. Further, clinicians can make more precise return-to-work recommendations and set goals for rehabilitation programs. A comparison of the normative values can be useful to the fields of rehabilitation, occupational, and insurance medicine. Further research is needed to test the validity of the normative values with respect to workplace assessments and return-to-work recommendations.
Soer R、van der Schans CP、Geertzen JH、Groothoff JW、Brouwer S、Dijkstra PU、Reneman MF。功能能力评估的标准值。
为健康在职受试者的功能能力评估（FCE）建立标准值。
描述性研究。
康复中心。
年龄在20至60岁之间、从事180多种职业的健康在职受试者（N = 701；448名男性，253名女性）。
受试者进行了一项为期2小时的FCE，包括12项与工作相关的测试。根据《职业名称词典》，受试者按体力要求分类。
提供了FCE标准值的均值、范围、标准差和百分位数，并对12项测试的结果进行了回归分析。
为4个体力要求类别建立了FCE标准值。
这些标准值能够将患者的表现与这些值进行比较。如果患者的表现超过其相应要求类别的最低分数，那么患者的能力很可能足以满足工作负荷。此外，临床医生可以做出更精确的重返工作岗位建议，并为康复计划设定目标。这些标准值的比较对康复、职业和保险医学领域可能有用。需要进一步研究以测试这些标准值在工作场所评估和重返工作岗位建议方面的有效性。
