Soer R, Gerrits E H J, Reneman M F
Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Work. 2006;26(3):273-80.
The aim of this study was to determine test-retest reliability of a Functional Capacity Evaluation for patients with non-specific Work Related Upper Limb Disorders (WRULD FCE). The study sample included 33 healthy adults, consisting of 14 males and 19 females with a mean age of 29.2 years. The WRULD FCE consisted of 8 different tests including 26 items measuring repetitive movements, duration, working in awkward positions, forceful movements and static postures. Two FCE sessions were held with a 10-day interval. Means, 95% confidence intervals, one-way random Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), 95% limits of agreement and repeated measures were calculated. An ICC between 0.75 and 0.90 was considered as good and an ICC above 0.90 was considered as an excellent reliability. The results showed that 14 of 26 items (54%) had excellent reliability, 9 of 26 items (35%) had good reliability and 3 of 26 items (11%) had moderate reliability based on ICC values. Significant learning effects were present in the Purdue Pegboard Task and in the Complete Minnesota Dexterity Test. It is concluded that the WRULD FCE is reliable in healthy adults.
本研究的目的是确定非特异性工作相关上肢疾病功能能力评估（WRULD FCE）的重测信度。研究样本包括33名健康成年人，其中14名男性和19名女性，平均年龄29.2岁。WRULD FCE包括8项不同测试，涵盖26个项目，用于测量重复动作、持续时间、在 awkward 姿势下工作、用力动作和静态姿势。进行了两次FCE测试，间隔10天。计算了均值、95%置信区间、单向随机组内相关系数（ICC）、95%一致性界限和重复测量值。ICC在0.75至0.90之间被认为良好，ICC高于0.90被认为具有出色的信度。结果显示，基于ICC值，26个项目中有14个（54%）具有出色的信度，26个项目中有9个（35%）具有良好的信度，26个项目中有3个（11%）具有中等信度。普渡钉板任务和明尼苏达完整灵活性测试中存在显著的学习效应。得出的结论是，WRULD FCE在健康成年人中是可靠的。 （注：原文中“awkward”未翻译，因为没有上下文明确其准确意思，直接保留英文更合适）
