• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 VigiBase 在协作信号检测研讨会上报告的患者报告的安全问题:Lareb 和 Uppsala 监测中心的结果和反思。

Safety Concerns Reported by Patients Identified in a Collaborative Signal Detection Workshop using VigiBase: Results and Reflections from Lareb and Uppsala Monitoring Centre.

机构信息

Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.

Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;41(2):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0594-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-017-0594-2
PMID:28933055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5808049/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient reporting in pharmacovigilance is important and contributes to signal detection. However, descriptions of methodologies for using patient reports in signal detection are scarce, and published experiences of how patient reports are used in pharmacovigilance are limited to a few individual countries.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to explore the contribution of patient reports to global signal detection in VigiBase.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from VigiBase in September 2016. Drug-event-combination series were restricted to those with >50% patient reports, defined as reporter type "Consumer/non-health professional" per E2B reporting standard. vigiRank was applied to patient reports to prioritize combinations for assessment. Product information for healthcare professionals (HCPs) as well as patient information leaflets (PILs) were used as reference for information on adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Staff from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre and the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb categorized the combinations. Potential signals proceeded to a more in-depth clinical review to determine whether the safety concern should be communicated as a "signal."

RESULTS

Of the 212 combinations assessed, 20 (9%) resulted in eight signals communicated within the World Health Organization (WHO) programme for international drug monitoring. Review of PILs revealed insufficient ADR descriptions for patients and examples of poor consistency with product information for HCPs. Patient narratives provided details regarding the experience and impact of ADRs and evidence that patients make causality and personal risk assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Safety concerns described in patient reports can be identified in a global database including previously unknown ADRs as well as new aspects of known ADRs. Patient reports provide unique information valuable in signal assessment and should be included in signal detection. Novel approaches to highlighting patient reports in statistical signal detection can further improve the contribution of patient reports to pharmacovigilance.

摘要

简介

在药物警戒中,患者报告十分重要,有助于信号检测。然而,用于检测信号时使用患者报告的方法描述却很少,并且药物警戒中使用患者报告的经验发表也仅限于少数几个国家。

目的

我们的目的是探索患者报告在 VigiBase 中的全球信号检测中的作用。

方法

数据于 2016 年 9 月从 VigiBase 中检索。药物-事件组合系列仅限于那些超过 50%为患者报告的药物-事件组合,按照 E2B 报告标准定义为报告类型为“消费者/非卫生专业人员”。应用 vigiRank 对患者报告进行优先级排序,以评估组合。产品信息(针对医护人员)和患者信息传单(PILs)被用作不良反应(ADR)信息的参考。来自乌普萨拉监测中心和荷兰药物警戒中心 Lareb 的工作人员对组合进行分类。潜在信号会进行更深入的临床审查,以确定是否应将安全问题作为“信号”进行沟通。

结果

在所评估的 212 种组合中,有 20 种(9%)导致了世界卫生组织(WHO)国际药物监测计划中通报的 8 个信号。审查 PILs 发现,针对患者的 ADR 描述不足,且与医护人员产品信息的一致性较差。患者叙述提供了有关 ADR 经历和影响的详细信息,以及患者进行因果关系和个人风险评估的证据。

结论

可以在包括先前未知 ADR 以及已知 ADR 新方面的全球数据库中识别出患者报告中描述的安全问题。患者报告提供了有价值的信号评估信息,应包括在信号检测中。突出统计信号检测中患者报告的新方法可以进一步提高患者报告对药物警戒的贡献。

相似文献

1
Safety Concerns Reported by Patients Identified in a Collaborative Signal Detection Workshop using VigiBase: Results and Reflections from Lareb and Uppsala Monitoring Centre.使用 VigiBase 在协作信号检测研讨会上报告的患者报告的安全问题:Lareb 和 Uppsala 监测中心的结果和反思。
Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;41(2):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0594-2.
2
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
3
Does patient reporting lead to earlier detection of drug safety signals? A retrospective comparison of time to reporting between patients and healthcare professionals in a global database.患者报告是否会导致药物安全信号的更早检测?在一个全球数据库中,对患者和医疗保健专业人员之间报告时间的回顾性比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1514-1524. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13576. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
A Feasibility Study of Drug-Drug Interaction Signal Detection in Regular Pharmacovigilance.常规药物警戒中药物-药物相互作用信号检测的可行性研究
Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):775-785. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00939-y.
5
The contribution of direct patient reported ADRs to drug safety signals in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2015.2010年至2015年期间,荷兰患者直接报告的药品不良反应对药物安全信号的贡献。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):977-983. doi: 10.1002/pds.4236. Epub 2017 May 19.
6
Risk Factor Considerations in Statistical Signal Detection: Using Subgroup Disproportionality to Uncover Risk Groups for Adverse Drug Reactions in VigiBase.统计信号检测中的风险因素考虑:使用亚组不均衡性揭示 VigiBase 中药物不良反应的风险人群。
Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;43(10):999-1009. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00957-w.
7
Data-Driven Identification of Adverse Event Reporting Patterns for Japan in VigiBase, the WHO Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports.基于个体病例安全报告的全球数据库(世卫组织全球数据库)的 Vigibase 中的数据驱动型日本不良事件报告模式识别。
Drug Saf. 2019 Dec;42(12):1487-1498. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00861-y.
8
Paediatric safety signals identified in VigiBase: Methods and results from Uppsala Monitoring Centre.儿童安全信号在 VigiBase 中的识别:乌普萨拉监测中心的方法和结果。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 May;28(5):680-689. doi: 10.1002/pds.4734. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Language does not come "in boxes": Assessing discrepancies between adverse drug reactions spontaneous reporting and MedDRA® codes in European Portuguese.语言并非“装在盒子里”:评估欧洲葡萄牙语中药物不良反应自发报告与MedDRA®编码之间的差异。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):664-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
10
Signals of adverse drug reactions communicated by pharmacovigilance stakeholders: protocol for a scoping review of the global literature.药物警戒利益相关者报告的药物不良反应信号:全球文献范围综述的研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 13;9(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01429-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with the completeness of information provided in adverse drug reaction reports of physicians, pharmacists and consumers from Germany.德国医生、药剂师和消费者药品不良反应报告中所提供信息完整性的相关因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 3;15(1):23751. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07973-9.
2
Adverse reactions of four multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a descriptive analysis of the WHO-VigiAccess database.四种多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的不良反应:世界卫生组织药物不良反应数据库的描述性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1585862. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1585862. eCollection 2025.
3
The characteristics of adverse reactions of three anti-prostate cancer drugs based on Vigiaccess database and bibliometric analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The contribution of direct patient reported ADRs to drug safety signals in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2015.2010年至2015年期间,荷兰患者直接报告的药品不良反应对药物安全信号的贡献。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):977-983. doi: 10.1002/pds.4236. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: An International Survey of National Competent Authorities' Views and Needs.患者对药物不良反应的报告:各国主管当局观点与需求的国际调查
Drug Saf. 2016 Nov;39(11):1105-1116. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0453-6.
3
The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review.
基于Vigiaccess数据库和文献计量分析的三种抗前列腺癌药物不良反应特征
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1570661. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570661. eCollection 2025.
4
Adverse event profile of lomustine and temozolomide: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.洛莫司汀和替莫唑胺的不良事件概况:来自世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库VigiAccess的描述性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 6;16:1534802. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1534802. eCollection 2025.
5
Unveiling the Burden of Drug-Induced Impulsivity: A Network Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.揭示药物诱导冲动性的负担:FDA 不良事件报告系统的网络分析。
Drug Saf. 2024 Dec;47(12):1275-1292. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01471-z. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
A real-world data analysis of ocular adverse events linked to anti-VEGF drugs: a WHO-VigiAccess study.一项关于抗VEGF药物相关眼部不良事件的真实世界数据分析:世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1398783. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1398783. eCollection 2024.
7
Characteristic analysis of adverse reactions of five anti-TNFɑ agents: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.五种抗TNFɑ药物不良反应的特征分析:来自世界卫生组织药物不良反应数据库(WHO-VigiAccess)的描述性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 24;14:1169327. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1169327. eCollection 2023.
8
Factors that influence patient and public adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework.影响患者和公众不良药物反应报告的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):801-813. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01591-z. Epub 2023 May 29.
9
Montelukast and Nightmares: Further Characterisation Using Data from VigiBase.孟鲁司特与梦魇:利用 VigiBase 数据进一步分析
Drug Saf. 2022 Jun;45(6):675-684. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01183-2. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
10
Strengthening therapeutic adherence and pharmacovigilance to antimalarial treatment in Manaus, Brazil: a multicomponent strategy using mHealth.强化巴西玛瑙斯地区抗疟治疗的治疗依从性和药物警戒:使用移动医疗的多组分策略。
Malar J. 2022 Jan 29;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04047-3.
患者向药物警戒系统报告的价值:一项系统评价
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;83(2):227-246. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13098. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
4
The Impact of Experiencing Adverse Drug Reactions on the Patient's Quality of Life: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in the Netherlands.药物不良反应对患者生活质量的影响:荷兰的一项回顾性横断面研究。
Drug Saf. 2016 Aug;39(8):769-76. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0422-0.
5
ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.公众药品不良反应报告:荷兰和瑞典系统的经验教训
Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;38(4):337-47. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1.
6
Adverse drug reaction reports of patients and healthcare professionals-differences in reported information.患者和医护人员的药品不良反应报告——报告信息的差异
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):152-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.3687. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
Improved statistical signal detection in pharmacovigilance by combining multiple strength-of-evidence aspects in vigiRank.通过在vigiRank中结合多个证据强度方面来改进药物警戒中的统计信号检测。
Drug Saf. 2014 Aug;37(8):617-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0204-5.
8
Performance of probabilistic method to detect duplicate individual case safety reports.用于检测重复个体病例安全报告的概率方法的性能
Drug Saf. 2014 Apr;37(4):249-58. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0146-y.
9
How do patients contribute to signal detection? : A retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the UK's Yellow Card Scheme.患者如何有助于信号检测?:英国黄卡计划中自发报告药物不良反应的回顾性分析。
Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;36(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0021-2.
10
Experiences from consumer reports on psychiatric adverse drug reactions with antidepressant medication: a qualitative study of reports to a consumer association.消费者报告抗抑郁药精神药物不良反应的经验:向消费者协会报告的定性研究。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 Dec 23;13:19. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-13-19.