Peter Beate, Lancaster Hope, Vose Caitlin, Middleton Kyle, Stoel-Gammon Carol
a Department of Speech and Hearing Science , Arizona State University , Tempe , AZ.
b Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders , Saint Louis University , St. Louis , MO.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(4):316-346. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1375560. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that individuals with dyslexia and individuals with childhood apraxia of speech share an underlying persisting deficit in processing sequential information. Levels of impairment (sensory encoding, memory, retrieval, and motor planning/programming) were also investigated. Participants were 22 adults with dyslexia, 10 adults with a probable history of childhood apraxia of speech (phCAS), and 22 typical controls. All participants completed nonword repetition, multisyllabic real word repetition, and nonword decoding tasks. Using phonological process analysis, errors were classified as sequence or substitution errors. Adults with dyslexia and adults with phCAS showed evidence of persisting nonword repetition deficits. In all three tasks, the adults in the two disorder groups produced more errors of both classes than the controls, but disproportionally more sequencing than substitution errors during the nonword repetition task. During the real word repetition task, the phCAS produced the most sequencing errors, whereas during the nonword decoding task, the dyslexia group produced the most sequencing errors. Performance during multisyllabic motor speech tasks, relative to monosyllabic conditions, was correlated with the sequencing error component during nonword repetition. The results provide evidence for a shared persisting sequential processing deficit in the dyslexia and phCAS groups during linguistic and motor speech tasks. Evidence for impairments in sensory encoding, short-term memory, and motor planning/programming was found in both disorder groups. Future studies should investigate clinical applications regarding preventative and targeted interventions towards cross-modal treatment effects.
患有诵读困难症的个体和患有儿童言语失用症的个体在处理序列信息方面存在潜在的持续性缺陷。同时还研究了损伤水平(感觉编码、记忆、检索和运动计划/编程)。参与者包括22名患有诵读困难症的成年人、10名可能有儿童言语失用症病史的成年人(phCAS)以及22名典型对照组。所有参与者都完成了非词重复、多音节实词重复和非词解码任务。使用语音过程分析,将错误分类为序列错误或替代错误。患有诵读困难症的成年人和患有phCAS的成年人表现出持续存在的非词重复缺陷。在所有三项任务中,两个障碍组的成年人产生的两类错误都比对照组多,但在非词重复任务中,序列错误比替代错误多得多。在实词重复任务中,phCAS组产生的序列错误最多,而在非词解码任务中,诵读困难症组产生的序列错误最多。与单音节条件相比,多音节运动言语任务中的表现与非词重复过程中的序列错误成分相关。研究结果为诵读困难症组和phCAS组在语言和运动言语任务中存在共同的持续性序列处理缺陷提供了证据。在两个障碍组中都发现了感觉编码、短期记忆和运动计划/编程方面存在损伤的证据。未来的研究应该调查关于针对跨模态治疗效果的预防和靶向干预的临床应用。