Peters Benjamin, Rahm Benjamin, Czoschke Stefan, Barnes Catherine, Kaiser Jochen, Bledowski Christoph
Institute of Medical Psychology.
Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):588-603. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000466. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Working memory (WM) enables a rapid access to a limited number of items that are no longer physically present. WM studies usually involve the encoding and retention of multiple items, while probing a single item only. Hence, little is known about how well multiple items can be reported from WM. Here we asked participants to successively report each of up to 8 encoded Gabor patches from WM. Recall order was externally cued, and stimulus orientations had to be reproduced on a continuous dimension. Participants were able to sequentially report items from WM with an above-chance precision even at high set sizes. It is important that we observed that precision varied systematically with report order: It dropped steeply from the first to the second report but decreased only slightly thereafter. The observed trajectory of precision decrease across reports was better captured as a discontinuous rather than an exponential function, suggesting that items were reported from different states in visual WM. The following 3 experiments replicated these findings. In particular, they showed that the observed drop could not be explained by a retro-cueing benefit of the first report, a longer delay duration for later reports or a visual interference effect of the first report. Instead, executive interference of the first report reduced precision of subsequent reports. Together, the results show that a sequential whole-report procedure allows the assessment of qualitatively different states in visual WM. (PsycINFO Database Record
工作记忆(WM)能够快速访问数量有限的不再实际呈现的项目。WM研究通常涉及多个项目的编码和保持,而仅探测单个项目。因此,对于从WM中能多好地报告多个项目知之甚少。在此,我们要求参与者依次从WM中报告多达8个编码的Gabor斑块中的每一个。回忆顺序由外部提示,并且刺激方向必须在连续维度上重现。即使在高集合大小的情况下,参与者也能够以高于机会水平的精度依次从WM中报告项目。重要的是,我们观察到精度随报告顺序系统地变化:从第一次报告到第二次报告急剧下降,但此后仅略有下降。跨报告观察到的精度下降轨迹作为不连续函数而非指数函数能得到更好的描述,这表明项目是从视觉WM中的不同状态报告的。接下来的3个实验重复了这些发现。特别是,它们表明观察到的下降不能用第一次报告的回溯提示益处、后续报告更长的延迟持续时间或第一次报告的视觉干扰效应来解释。相反,第一次报告的执行干扰降低了后续报告的精度。总之,结果表明顺序全报告程序允许评估视觉WM中质的不同状态。(PsycINFO数据库记录)