Browne Patience, Noyes Pamela D, Casey Warren M, Dix David J
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Washington, DC, USA.
National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 1;125(9):096001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1304.
The U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) screens and tests environmental chemicals for potential effects in estrogen, androgen, and thyroid hormone pathways, and it is one of the only regulatory programs designed around chemical mode of action.
This review describes the EDSP's use of adverse outcome pathway (AOP) and toxicity pathway frameworks to organize and integrate diverse biological data for evaluating the endocrine activity of chemicals. Using these frameworks helps to establish biologically plausible links between endocrine mechanisms and apical responses when those end points are not measured in the same assay.
Pathway frameworks can facilitate a weight of evidence determination of a chemical's potential endocrine activity, identify data gaps, aid study design, direct assay development, and guide testing strategies. Pathway frameworks also can be used to evaluate the performance of computational approaches as alternatives for low-throughput and animal-based assays and predict downstream key events. In cases where computational methods can be validated based on performance, they may be considered as alternatives to specific assays or end points.
A variety of biological systems affect apical end points used in regulatory risk assessments, and without mechanistic data, an endocrine mode of action cannot be determined. Because the EDSP was designed to consider mode of action, toxicity pathway and AOP concepts are a natural fit. Pathway frameworks have diverse applications to endocrine screening and testing. An estrogen pathway example is presented, and similar approaches are being used to evaluate alternative methods and develop predictive models for androgen and thyroid pathways. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1304.
美国环境保护局的内分泌干扰物筛选计划(EDSP)对环境化学品进行筛选和测试,以评估其在雌激素、雄激素和甲状腺激素途径中的潜在影响,它是少数几个围绕化学作用模式设计的监管计划之一。
本综述描述了EDSP如何使用不良结局途径(AOP)和毒性途径框架来组织和整合各种生物学数据,以评估化学品的内分泌活性。当这些终点在同一试验中未被测量时,使用这些框架有助于在内分泌机制和顶端反应之间建立生物学上合理的联系。
途径框架有助于对化学品潜在的内分泌活性进行证据权重判定,识别数据缺口,辅助研究设计,指导试验开发以及测试策略。途径框架还可用于评估计算方法作为低通量和基于动物试验的替代方法的性能,并预测下游关键事件。在基于性能可以验证计算方法的情况下,可以将其视为特定试验或终点的替代方法。
多种生物系统会影响监管风险评估中使用的顶端终点,并且没有机制数据就无法确定内分泌作用模式。由于EDSP旨在考虑作用模式,毒性途径和AOP概念自然适用。途径框架在内分泌筛选和测试中有多种应用。本文给出了一个雌激素途径的例子,并且正在使用类似的方法来评估替代方法并开发雄激素和甲状腺途径的预测模型。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1304