Suppr超能文献

用于评估工作环境室内空气质量的商用主动式采样器的挥发性有机化合物回收率比较。

Comparison of the volatile organic compound recovery rates of commercial active samplers for evaluation of indoor air quality in work environments.

作者信息

Miyake Yuichi, Tokumura Masahiro, Wang Qi, Wang Zhiwei, Amagai Takashi

机构信息

Graduate School of Nutritional and Environmental Science, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, 422-8526 Japan.

出版信息

Air Qual Atmos Health. 2017;10(6):737-746. doi: 10.1007/s11869-017-0465-0. Epub 2017 Feb 18.

Abstract

The Industrial Safety and Health Law in Japan established administrative levels for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in indoor air. In the present study, these 49 VOCs were extracted from the absorbents of commercial active samplers from Sibata Scientific Technology (carbon-bead active sampler), SKC Inc. (Anasorb CSC sorbent tube), and Gastec (bead-shaped activated carbon tube) using carbon disulfide, and the recovery rates were compared. The VOCs were added to the adsorbents at three concentration levels relative to the administrative levels (×0.5, ×1, and ×2). The following mean recovery rates of the 49 VOCs were obtained at the ×0.5, ×1, and ×2 levels: 86, 93, and 92% for the Sibata sampler; 78, 82, and 84% for the SKC sampler; and 94, 93, and 90% for the Gastec sampler. With the Sibata sampler, the recovery rates of 78% (×0.5), 84% (×1), and 90% (×2) of the VOCs measured in this study were adequate (80-120%); the corresponding percentages for the SKC sampler were 67% (×0.5), 69% (×1), and 69% (×2), and those for the Gastec sampler were 92% (×0.5), 86% (×1), and 86% (×2). The effects of the octanol-water partition coefficients and vapor pressures of the VOCs on the recovery rates were investigated. The recovery rates increased with increases in the octanol-water partition coefficient and the vapor pressure and then leveled off. The recovery rates for the -, -, and -cresol isomers were much lower than those obtained for other VOCs at all three concentration levels and with all samplers.

摘要

日本的《工业安全与健康法》规定了室内空气中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的管理标准。在本研究中,使用二硫化碳从柴田科学技术公司(碳珠活性采样器)、SKC公司(Anasorb CSC吸附剂管)和Gastec公司(珠状活性炭管)的商用活性采样器的吸附剂中提取了这49种VOCs,并比较了回收率。相对于管理标准,将VOCs以三种浓度水平添加到吸附剂中(×0.5、×1和×2)。在×0.5、×1和×2水平下,获得了以下49种VOCs的平均回收率:柴田采样器分别为86%、93%和92%;SKC采样器分别为78%、82%和84%;Gastec采样器分别为94%、93%和90%。对于柴田采样器,本研究中测量的VOCs回收率分别为78%(×0.5)、84%(×1)和90%(×2),处于适当范围(80 - 120%);SKC采样器的相应百分比分别为67%(×0.5)、69%(×1)和69%(×2),Gastec采样器的相应百分比分别为92%(×0.5)、86%(×1)和86%(×2)。研究了VOCs的辛醇 - 水分配系数和蒸气压对回收率的影响。回收率随着辛醇 - 水分配系数和蒸气压的增加而增加,然后趋于平稳。在所有三种浓度水平和所有采样器中,邻甲酚、间甲酚和对甲酚异构体的回收率远低于其他VOCs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d4/5581818/870d95035967/11869_2017_465_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验