Suppr超能文献

多吸附剂床(Carbotrap、Carbopack X、Carboxen 569)和 Tenax TA 吸附管对挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)分析的吸附性能比较研究。

Comparative study of the adsorption performance of a multi-sorbent bed (Carbotrap, Carbopack X, Carboxen 569) and a Tenax TA adsorbent tube for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

机构信息

Laboratori del Centre de Medi Ambient, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (LCMA-UPC), Avda. Diagonal, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Talanta. 2010 May 15;81(3):916-24. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.037. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Abstract

A comparison between two types of adsorbent tubes, the commonly used Tenax TA and a multi-sorbent bed (Carbotrap, Carbopack X, Carboxen 569) tube developed in our laboratory, has been done to evaluate their usefulness in the analysis of VOCs in ambient air. Duplicate indoor and outdoor samples of Tenax TA and multi-sorbent tubes of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 90l were taken in Barcelona city (Spain) on July and October of 2009. Breakthrough values (defined as %VOCs found in the back tube) were determined for all sampling volumes connecting two sampling tubes in series. The analysis was performed by automatic thermal desorption (ATD) coupled with capillary gas chromatography (GC)/mass spectrometry detector (MSD). Significant differences between the concentrations obtained-from multi-sorbent bed and Tenax TA tubes are observed for the very volatile compounds (56 degrees C<boiling point<100 degrees C and 4kPa<vapour pressure (20 degrees C)<47kPa) (e.g. acetone, isopropanol, n-hexane) and for alcohols and chlorinated compounds (e.g. 1-butanol, carbon disulphide, dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene), being the concentrations found higher in multi-sorbent bed than in Tenax TA tubes. On the other hand, mainly all compounds with boiling points higher than 100 degrees C (except alpha-pinene, chlorinated and polar compounds) do not show significant differences between the obtained multi-sorbent bed and Tenax TA tube concentrations. For the concentrations obtained (5ppt to 100ppb), Tenax TA present high breakthrough values (from 0 to 77%) for mainly all compounds and sampling volumes studied. On the other hand, multi-sorbent bed tubes do not exhibit important breakthrough values for these compounds, except the VVOCs ethanol (for all sampled volumes), and acetone, dichloromethane and isopropanol (for sampling volumes over 40l). The concentration differences observed between Tenax TA and multi-sorbent bed tubes are directly related to the high breakthrough values determined for Tenax TA adsorbent.

摘要

曾对两种类型的吸附管,即常用的 Tenax TA 和我们实验室开发的多吸附床(Carbotrap、Carbopack X、Carboxen 569)管进行了比较,以评估它们在分析环境空气中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)方面的有用性。2009 年 7 月和 10 月,在西班牙巴塞罗那市对 Tenax TA 和多吸附床管的 10、20、40、60 和 90L 进行了室内和室外的重复采样。通过将两个串联的采样管连接起来,确定了所有采样体积的穿透值(定义为在后管中发现的 VOCs%)。通过自动热解吸(ATD)与毛细管气相色谱(GC)/质谱检测器(MSD)联用进行分析。在非常挥发性化合物(56°C<沸点<100°C 和 4kPa<蒸气压(20°C)<47kPa)(例如丙酮、异丙醇、正己烷)和醇类和氯化化合物(例如 1-丁醇、二硫化碳、二氯甲烷、氯仿、四氯化碳、三氯乙烯、四氯乙烯)中,多吸附床和 Tenax TA 管之间的浓度存在显著差异,多吸附床管中的浓度高于 Tenax TA 管。另一方面,沸点高于 100°C 的主要所有化合物(除了α-蒎烯、氯化和极性化合物),在多吸附床和 Tenax TA 管之间的浓度没有显著差异。对于所获得的浓度(5ppt 到 100ppb),Tenax TA 对主要所有化合物和研究的采样体积都表现出较高的穿透值(0 到 77%)。另一方面,多吸附床管对于这些化合物没有表现出重要的穿透值,除了 VVOCs 乙醇(对于所有采样体积)以及丙酮、二氯甲烷和异丙醇(对于超过 40L 的采样体积)。在 Tenax TA 和多吸附床管之间观察到的浓度差异与对 Tenax TA 吸附剂确定的高穿透值直接相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验