Waddle Mark R, Sio Terence T, Van Houten Holly K, Foote Robert L, Keole Sameer R, Schild Steven E, Laack Nadia, Daniels Thomas B, Crown William, Shah Nilay D, Miller Robert C
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Dec 1;99(5):1078-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.042. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
To characterize the changes in the use of radiation therapy (RT), specifically proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT), among adult and pediatric patients over a 11-year period in a very large population of insured patients.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the OptumLabs Data Warehouse claims database of more than 100 million insured US enrollees. Descriptive analyses were undertaken to evaluate the characteristics of patients receiving RT from 2002 to 2012.
There were 474,533 patients treated with RT from 2002 to 2012. The percentage of patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 2-dimensional RT/brachytherapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and PBRT was 34.5%, 63.4%, 2.1%, 0.0%, and 0.1% and 40.4%, 36.0%, 21.9%, 1.1%, and 0.6% in 2002 and 2012, respectively. The greatest increase in utilization was of IMRT for prostate cancer, growing from 3.5% to 64.0%. For non-prostate cancer adults, IMRT use grew from 1.7% to 16.4%. For children, PBRT utilization increased from 0.3% to 9.7%. For prostate cancer patients, PBRT increased from 0.0% to 2.6%. For all patients, advanced technology (SBRT and PBRT) use was very low at <2%, versus 22% for IMRT.
This is the largest and most geographically diverse description of RT utilization. Proton beam RT utilization remains very low and has had little impact on overall RT utilization compared with IMRT. The largest shift has occurred in IMRT for prostate cancer. Our findings indicate that overall utilization of proton therapy has been low and that its use has likely had little impact on national expenditures on cancer care in the current environment.
在大量参保患者群体中,描述成人和儿童患者在11年期间放射治疗(RT),特别是质子束放射治疗(PBRT)使用情况的变化。
我们对OptumLabs数据仓库中超过1亿美国参保者的理赔数据库进行了回顾性分析。进行描述性分析以评估2002年至2012年接受放射治疗患者的特征。
2002年至2012年期间有474,533例患者接受了放射治疗。2002年和2012年,接受三维适形放射治疗、二维放射治疗/近距离放射治疗、调强放射治疗(IMRT)、立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)和质子束放射治疗的患者百分比分别为34.5%、63.4%、2.1%、0.0%和0.1%以及40.4%、36.0%、21.9%、1.1%和0.6%。使用量增长最大的是前列腺癌的调强放射治疗,从3.5%增至64.0%。对于非前列腺癌成人患者,调强放射治疗的使用从1.7%增至16.4%。对于儿童患者,质子束放射治疗的使用率从0.3%增至9.7%。对于前列腺癌患者,质子束放射治疗从0.0%增至2.6%%。对于所有患者,先进技术(立体定向体部放射治疗和质子束放射治疗)的使用率非常低,低于 <2%,而调强放射治疗为22%。
这是对放射治疗使用情况最大且地域分布最广的描述。质子束放射治疗的使用率仍然非常低,与调强放射治疗相比,对总体放射治疗使用率的影响很小。最大的变化发生在前列腺癌的调强放射治疗方面。我们的研究结果表明,质子治疗的总体使用率一直较低且在当前环境下其使用可能对国家癌症护理支出影响不大。