Pan Hubert Y, Jiang Jing, Shih Ya-Chen Tina, Smith Benjamin D
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Aug;14(8):1027-1033.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.040. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
Despite enthusiasm for advanced radiation technologies, understanding of their adoption in recent years is limited. The aim of this study was to elucidate utilization trends of conventional radiation, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), brachytherapy, proton radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using a large convenience sample of irradiated patients with cancer identified from private insurance claims in the United States. The unit of analysis was a claim corresponding to a fraction of delivered radiotherapy from 2008 to 2014. Each claim was assigned a disease site on the basis of the diagnosis code and a radiation technology on the basis of the procedure code. In 2014, conventional radiation and IMRT constituted 56% and 39% of all radiation treatment claims, respectively, while brachytherapy constituted 2%, proton radiotherapy 1%, SBRT 1%, and SRS <1%. Compared with the first quarter of 2008, the proportional contribution of conventional radiation and brachytherapy to all radiation claims each decreased by 16% in the fourth quarter of 2014. In contrast, proportional contribution increased by 32% for IMRT, 83% for proton radiotherapy, 124% for SRS, and 309% for SBRT. Prostate cancer constituted 60% of all proton claims in 2008 but declined to 37% by 2014. SBRT was used to treat a variety of disease sites, most commonly primary lung (25%), prostate (12%), secondary bone (9%), and secondary lung (9%), in 2014. In this claims-based analysis of younger patients with private insurance, conventional radiation and IMRT were the most commonly used technologies from 2008 to 2014, while SBRT showed the most robust growth over the study period.
尽管人们对先进放疗技术充满热情,但近年来对其应用情况的了解却很有限。本研究旨在利用从美国私人保险理赔记录中识别出的大量接受放疗的癌症患者便利样本,阐明传统放疗、调强放射治疗(IMRT)、近距离放射治疗、质子放疗、立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)和立体定向放射外科(SRS)的使用趋势。分析单位是对应2008年至2014年期间每次放疗分次的一份理赔记录。根据诊断代码为每份理赔记录指定一个疾病部位,并根据程序代码指定一种放疗技术。2014年,传统放疗和IMRT分别占所有放疗治疗理赔记录的56%和39%,而近距离放射治疗占2%,质子放疗占1%,SBRT占1%,SRS占比不到1%。与2008年第一季度相比,2014年第四季度传统放疗和近距离放射治疗在所有放疗理赔记录中的占比分别下降了16%。相比之下,IMRT的占比增加了32%,质子放疗增加了83%,SRS增加了124%,SBRT增加了309%。2008年,前列腺癌占所有质子放疗理赔记录的60%,但到2014年降至37%。2014年,SBRT用于治疗多种疾病部位,最常见的是原发性肺癌(25%)、前列腺(12%)、继发性骨(9%)和继发性肺癌(9%)。在这项基于理赔记录的年轻私人保险患者分析中,2008年至2014年期间最常用的技术是传统放疗和IMRT,而SBRT在研究期间增长最为强劲。