Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):47-58. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12759. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Allee effects have important implications for many aspects of basic and applied ecology. The benefits of aggregation of conspecific individuals are central to Allee effects, which have led to the widely held assumption that social species are more prone to Allee effects. Robust evidence for this assumption, however, remains rare. Furthermore, previous research on Allee effects has failed to adequately address the consequences of the different levels of organisation within social species' populations. Here, we review available evidence of Allee effects and model the role of demographic and behavioural factors that may combine to dampen or strengthen Allee effects in social species. We use examples across various species with contrasting social structure, including carnivores, bats, primates and eusocial insects. Building on this, we provide a conceptual framework that allows for the integration of different Allee effects in social species. Social species are characterised by nested levels of organisation. The benefits of cooperation, measured by mean individual fitness, can be observed at both the population and group levels, giving rise to "population level" and "group level" Allee effects respectively. We also speculate on the possibility of a third level, reporting per capita benefits for different individuals within a group (e.g. castes in social insects). We show that group size heterogeneity and intergroup interactions affect the strength of population-level demographic Allee effects. Populations with higher group size heterogeneity and in which individual social groups cooperate demonstrate the weakest Allee effects and may thus provide an explanation for why extinctions due to Allee effects are rare in social species. More adequately accounting for Allee effects in social species will improve our understanding of the ecological and evolutionary implications of cooperation in social species.
聚集效应对基础和应用生态学的许多方面都有重要意义。同种个体聚集的好处是聚集效应的核心,这导致了一个广泛的假设,即社会性物种更容易受到聚集效应的影响。然而,这一假设的有力证据仍然很少。此外,以前关于聚集效应的研究未能充分考虑到社会性物种种群内不同组织层次的后果。在这里,我们回顾了可用的聚集效应证据,并对可能减弱或增强社会性物种聚集效应的人口和行为因素进行建模。我们使用了来自不同社会结构的各种物种的例子,包括食肉动物、蝙蝠、灵长类动物和真社会性昆虫。在此基础上,我们提供了一个概念框架,允许在社会性物种中整合不同的聚集效应。社会性物种的特征是嵌套的组织层次。合作的好处(以个体平均适应度来衡量)可以在种群和群体两个层面上观察到,从而分别产生“种群水平”和“群体水平”的聚集效应。我们还推测了第三个层次的可能性,即报告群体内不同个体的人均收益(例如社会性昆虫中的不同等级)。我们表明,群体大小异质性和群体间相互作用会影响种群水平人口统计聚集效应的强度。群体大小异质性较高且个体社会群体合作的种群表现出最弱的聚集效应,因此这可能解释了为什么社会性物种由于聚集效应而灭绝的情况很少见。更充分地考虑社会性物种中的聚集效应将提高我们对社会性物种中合作的生态和进化意义的理解。