Suppr超能文献

认知进化模型的意外:证据综述。

The Cognitive-Evolutionary Model of Surprise: A Review of the Evidence.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald.

Institute of Psychology, University of Bielefeld.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):50-74. doi: 10.1111/tops.12292. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

Abstract

Research on surprise relevant to the cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise proposed by Meyer, Reisenzein, and Schützwohl (1997) is reviewed. The majority of the assumptions of the model are found empirically supported. Surprise is evoked by unexpected (schema-discrepant) events and its intensity is determined by the degree if schema-discrepancy, whereas the novelty and the valence of the eliciting events probably do not have an independent effect. Unexpected events cause an automatic interruption of ongoing mental processes that is followed by an attentional shift and attentional binding to the events, which is often followed by causal and other event analysis processes and by schema revision. The facial expression of surprise postulated by evolutionary emotion psychologists has been found to occur rarely in surprise, for as yet unknown reasons. A physiological orienting response marked by skin conductance increase, heart rate deceleration, and pupil dilation has been observed to occur regularly in the standard version of the repetition-change paradigm of surprise induction, but the specificity of these reactions as indicators of surprise is controversial. There is indirect evidence for the assumption that the feeling of surprise consists of the direct awareness of the schema-discrepancy signal, but this feeling, or at least the self-report of surprise, is also influenced by experienced interference. In contrast, facial feedback probably does contribute substantially to the feeling of surprise and the evidence for the hypothesis that surprise is affected by the difficulty of explaining an unexpected event is, in our view, inconclusive. Regardless of how the surprise feeling is constituted, there is evidence that it has both motivational and informational effects. Finally, the prediction failure implied by unexpected events sometimes causes a negative feeling, but there is no convincing evidence that this is always the case, and we argue that even if it were so, this would not be a sufficient reason for regarding this feeling as a component, rather than as an effect of surprise.

摘要

对 Meyer、Reisenzein 和 Schützwohl(1997)提出的与惊讶相关的认知进化模型的研究进行了回顾。该模型的大多数假设都得到了经验支持。惊讶是由意外(与模式不符)事件引起的,其强度由模式不符的程度决定,而引发事件的新颖性和效价可能没有独立的影响。意外事件会导致正在进行的心理过程自动中断,随后是注意力转移和对事件的注意力绑定,这通常伴随着因果和其他事件分析过程以及模式修正。进化情绪心理学家假设的惊讶面部表情在惊讶中很少出现,原因尚不清楚。在惊讶的标准重复变化范式中,观察到一种以皮肤电导增加、心率减速和瞳孔扩张为标志的生理定向反应,但这些反应作为惊讶指标的特异性存在争议。有间接证据表明,惊讶的感觉由对模式差异信号的直接感知组成,但这种感觉,或者至少是对惊讶的自我报告,也受到经历干扰的影响。相比之下,面部反馈可能对惊讶感有很大贡献,而关于惊讶感受到解释意外事件难度影响的假设的证据,在我们看来,尚无定论。无论惊讶感是如何构成的,都有证据表明它具有动机和信息作用。最后,意外事件所暗示的预测失败有时会导致负面情绪,但没有令人信服的证据表明情况总是如此,我们认为,即使是这样,这也不是将这种感觉视为惊讶的一个组成部分而不是其效应的充分理由。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验