• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惊喜与图式强度。

Surprise and schema strength.

作者信息

Schützwohl A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Sep;24(5):1182-99. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1182.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1182
PMID:9747529
Abstract

Through 4 experiments, the author investigated the effects of stimuli discrepant with schemas of varying strength on 3 components of surprise: the interruption of ongoing activities (indexed by response time increase), the focusing of attention on the schema-discrepant event (indexed by memory performance), and the feeling of surprise (indexed by self-reports). Response times were consistently found to increase with schema strength. This effect was attributed to the increasing difficulty of schema revision. In contrast, memory for the schema-discrepant event was not affected by schema strength, supporting the hypothesis that schema-discrepant stimuli are stored in memory with a distinct tag. Finally, self-reports of surprise intensity varied with schema strength only if they were made immediately after the surprising event without any intervening questions, suggesting that self-reports of surprise are highly susceptible to memory distortions.

摘要

通过4项实验,作者研究了与不同强度图式不一致的刺激对惊讶的三个组成部分的影响:正在进行的活动的中断(以反应时间增加为指标)、注意力集中在与图式不一致的事件上(以记忆表现为指标)以及惊讶的感觉(以自我报告为指标)。研究一致发现,反应时间会随着图式强度的增加而增加。这种效应归因于图式修正难度的增加。相比之下,对与图式不一致事件的记忆不受图式强度的影响,这支持了以下假设:与图式不一致的刺激以独特的标签存储在记忆中。最后,只有在令人惊讶的事件发生后立即进行自我报告且没有任何中间问题时,惊讶强度的自我报告才会随图式强度而变化,这表明惊讶的自我报告极易受到记忆扭曲的影响。

相似文献

1
Surprise and schema strength.惊喜与图式强度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Sep;24(5):1182-99. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1182.
2
The Cognitive-Evolutionary Model of Surprise: A Review of the Evidence.认知进化模型的意外:证据综述。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):50-74. doi: 10.1111/tops.12292. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
3
[Effect of associative strength of schema elements on intensity of startle reaction].[图式元素关联强度对惊吓反应强度的影响]
Z Exp Psychol. 1998;45(3):203-17.
4
The surprise-attention link: a review.惊奇与注意力的联系:综述
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:106-15. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12679. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
Working memory representations persist in the face of unexpected task alterations.工作记忆表征在面对意外的任务变更时依然存在。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1408-1414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1318-5.
6
Behavioral, Physiological, and Neural Signatures of Surprise during Naturalistic Sports Viewing.自然主义体育观看中惊喜的行为、生理和神经特征。
Neuron. 2021 Jan 20;109(2):377-390.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
The Role of Surprise in Learning: Different Surprising Outcomes Affect Memorability Differentially.惊喜在学习中的作用:不同的惊喜结果对可记性的影响不同。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):75-87. doi: 10.1111/tops.12392. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
8
Neural activation patterns during retrieval of schema-related memories: differences and commonalities between children and adults.提取图式相关记忆时的神经激活模式:儿童与成人的差异和共性。
Dev Sci. 2017 Nov;20(6). doi: 10.1111/desc.12475. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty.为何有些惊喜比其他惊喜更令人惊讶:作为一种对解释难度的元认知感受的惊喜。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Sep;81:74-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory.图式和图式介导记忆的神经生物学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;21(8):618-631. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of the Perception of Primary Facial Emotions on Corticospinal Excitability.对基本面部表情的感知对皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响。
Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):1291. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091291.
2
Does prediction error during exposure relate to clinical outcomes in cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder? A study protocol.暴露过程中的预测误差与社交焦虑障碍认知行为疗法的临床结果有关吗?一项研究方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 24;13:1000686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1000686. eCollection 2022.
3
A New Explanation for the Frog-in-the-Pan Phenomenon Based on the Cognitive-Evolutionary Model of Surprise.
基于惊奇认知进化模型对“温水煮青蛙”现象的新解释
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):7. doi: 10.3390/bs13010007.
4
Spatiotemporal Signatures of Surprise Captured by Magnetoencephalography.通过脑磁图捕获的惊奇的时空特征。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jun 13;16:865453. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.865453. eCollection 2022.
5
The Impact of Action Effects on Infants' Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months.动作效果对7个月、11个月和18个月大婴儿对非人类抓握动作的预测性注视转移的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 10;12:695550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695550. eCollection 2021.
6
Humans show a higher preference for stimuli that are predictive relative to those that are predictable.与可预测的刺激相比,人类对具有预测性的刺激表现出更高的偏好。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0935-x. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
7
Open-Minded Midwifes, Literate Butchers, and Greedy Hooligans-The Independent Contributions of Stereotype Valence and Consistency on Evaluative Judgments.思想开放的助产士、识字的屠夫和贪婪的流氓——刻板印象效价和一致性对评价性判断的独立贡献。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01723. eCollection 2017.
8
Dealing With Unexpected Events on the Flight Deck: A Conceptual Model of Startle and Surprise.应对飞行甲板上的突发事件:惊愕和惊讶的概念模型。
Hum Factors. 2017 Dec;59(8):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/0018720817723428. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
9
Neural Responses to Rapid Facial Expressions of Fear and Surprise.对恐惧和惊讶的快速面部表情的神经反应。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00761. eCollection 2017.
10
Algorithms for survival: a comparative perspective on emotions.生存算法:情感的比较视角。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 May;18(5):311-319. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.35. Epub 2017 Mar 31.