Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug;99(8):1623-1634.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.482. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
OBJECTIVE: To review scientific literature studying the effectiveness of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential eligible studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies (2 reviews and 22 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). For physical therapy, moderate evidence was found for myofascial massage therapy versus ischemic compression on latent, or active, trigger points or low-level laser therapy in the short term. For several electrophysical modalities, moderate evidence was found in the short term (ultrasound vs placebo, ultrasound as single intervention vs other nonsurgical interventions, ultrasound vs corticosteroid injection plus a neutral wrist splint, local microwave hyperthermia vs placebo, iontophoresis vs phonophoresis, pulsed radiofrequency added to wrist splint, continuous vs pulsed vs placebo shortwave diathermy, and interferential current vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs a night-only wrist splint). In the midterm, moderate evidence was found in favor of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) added to a neutral wrist splint, in favor of ESWT versus ultrasound, or cryo-ultrasound, and in favor of ultrasound versus placebo. For all other interventions studied, only limited, conflicting, or no evidence was found. No RCTs investigating the long-term effects of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities were found. Because of heterogeneity in the treatment parameters used in the included RCTs, optimal treatment parameters could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate evidence was found for several physical therapy and electrophysical modalities for CTS in the short term and midterm. Future studies should concentrate on long-term effects and which treatment parameters of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities are most effective for CTS.
目的:回顾研究物理疗法和电物理疗法治疗腕管综合征(CTS)有效性的科学文献。
资料来源:Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和物理治疗证据数据库。
研究选择:两位审查员独立应用纳入标准选择潜在合格的研究。
数据提取:两位审查员独立提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。
数据综合:对纳入研究(2 项综述和 22 项随机对照试验 [RCT])的结果进行最佳证据综合。对于物理疗法,肌筋膜按摩疗法与缺血性压迫治疗潜伏或活动触发点或低水平激光疗法在短期有中度证据。对于几种电物理疗法,在短期有中度证据(超声与安慰剂、超声单一干预与其他非手术干预、超声与皮质类固醇注射加中性腕夹板、局部微波热疗与安慰剂、离子电渗疗法与声透疗法、脉冲射频加腕夹板、连续与脉冲与安慰剂短波透热疗法、干扰电流与经皮神经电刺激与仅夜间腕夹板)。在中期,有中度证据支持在中性腕夹板上加用桡动脉体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、ESWT 优于超声或冷冻超声、超声优于安慰剂。对于所有其他研究的干预措施,只有有限的、相互矛盾的或没有证据。没有发现研究物理疗法和电物理疗法长期效果的 RCT。由于纳入的 RCT 中使用的治疗参数存在异质性,因此无法确定最佳治疗参数。
结论:在短期和中期,有中度证据表明几种物理疗法和电物理疗法对 CTS 有效。未来的研究应集中于长期效果以及物理疗法和电物理疗法的哪些治疗参数对 CTS 最有效。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017-5-31
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010-7
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018-4-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-6-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-1-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-6-5
Healthcare (Basel). 2024-8-26
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023-8-29
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023-8-10
Biomedicines. 2023-6-17