Suppr超能文献

手术和术后干预治疗腕管综合征的效果:系统评价。

Effectiveness of Surgical and Postsurgical Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-A Systematic Review.

机构信息

University Medical Center Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

University Medical Center Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug;99(8):1660-1680.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to April 8, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results. Four systematic reviews and 33 RCTs were included. Surgery versus nonsurgical interventions, timing of surgery, and various surgical techniques and postoperative interventions were studied. Corticosteroid injection was more effective than surgery (strong evidence, short-term). Surgery was more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy (moderate evidence, midterm and long-term). Manual therapy was more effective than surgical treatment (moderate evidence, short-term and midterm). Within surgery, corticosteroid irrigation of the median nerve before skin closure as additive to CTS release or the direct vision plus tunneling technique was more effective than standard open CTS release (moderate evidence, short-term). Furthermore, short was more effective than long bulky dressings, and a sensory retraining program was more effective than no program after surgery (moderate evidence, short-term). For all other interventions only conflicting, limited, or no evidence was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment seems to be more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the short-term, midterm, and/or long-term to treat CTS. However there is strong evidence that a local corticosteroid injection is more effective than surgery in the short-term, and moderate evidence that manual therapy is more effective than surgery in the short-term and midterm. There is no unequivocal evidence that suggests one surgical treatment is more effective than the other. Postsurgical, a short- (2-3 days) favored a long-duration (9-14 days) bulky dressing and a sensory retraining program seems to be more effective than no program in short-term. More research regarding the optimal timing of surgery for CTS is needed.

摘要

目的

对手术和术后干预治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的有效性进行基于证据的综述。

数据来源

截至 2016 年 4 月 8 日,检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PEDro 以获取相关的系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT)。

研究选择

两位评审员独立应用纳入标准选择潜在的研究。

数据提取

两位评审员独立提取数据并评估方法学质量。

数据综合

对结果进行最佳证据综合。共纳入 4 项系统评价和 33 项 RCT。研究了手术与非手术干预、手术时机以及各种手术技术和术后干预。皮质类固醇注射比手术更有效(短期,强证据)。手术比夹板或抗炎药物加手部治疗更有效(中期和长期,中等证据)。手法治疗比手术治疗更有效(短期和中期,中等证据)。在手术中,在皮肤闭合前将皮质类固醇冲洗到正中神经作为 CTS 释放的附加治疗,或者直视加隧道技术,比标准开放 CTS 释放更有效(短期,中等证据)。此外,短期使用比长期使用体积大的敷料更有效,手术后进行感觉再训练计划比不进行计划更有效(短期,中等证据)。对于所有其他干预措施,仅发现相互矛盾、有限或没有证据。

结论

在短期、中期和/或长期,手术治疗似乎比夹板或抗炎药物加手部治疗更有效,但短期皮质类固醇注射比手术更有效,短期和中期手法治疗比手术更有效,这些都是强证据。没有确凿的证据表明一种手术治疗比另一种更有效。术后,短期(2-3 天)使用体积大的敷料(9-14 天)比长期使用体积大的敷料更有效,且短期使用感觉再训练计划比不使用计划更有效。需要更多关于 CTS 手术最佳时机的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验