• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泌尿外科住院医师匹配中的性别差异——这有影响吗?

Gender Differences in the Urology Residency Match-Does It Make a Difference?

作者信息

Aisen Carrie M, Sui Wilson, Pak Jamie S, Pagano Matthew, Cooper Kimberly L, Badalato Gina M

机构信息

Department of Urology, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Urology. 2018 Jan;111:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.061
PMID:28943372
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the differences between the male and female urology resident applicant pool. Urology is a competitive field with a selective match process. Women have historically been a minority in medicine. Although this has equalized, women continue to be underrepresented in urology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All application submitted through the Electronic Residency Application Service to the Columbia University Department of Urology for the 2015 and 2016 match were reviewed. The differences between the cohorts of matched female and male urology applicants were assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-six students in 2015 and 259 students in 2016 submitted applications to Columbia and completed rank lists (60% of the national cohort in 2015 and 62% in 2016). We did find that the overall male applicant pool had a slightly lower number of honors (3 vs 2, P = .02) and higher United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 score (238 vs 234, P <.001). The only other statistically significant difference between the matched male and female cohorts was the average number of urology subinternships (1.4 [0.9] for men vs 1.18 [0.8] for women, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Overall matched male and female applicants appeared to have very similar qualifications. Men had a higher USMLE step 1 score and women had a higher average number of honors. These data support the finding that contemporary male and female residency candidates who matched in urology had comparable achievements, and the criteria for residency selection in both cohorts are similar.

摘要

目的

评估男性和女性泌尿外科住院医师申请者群体之间的差异。泌尿外科是一个竞争激烈的领域,匹配过程具有选择性。从历史上看,女性在医学领域一直是少数群体。尽管这种情况已经有所改善,但女性在泌尿外科领域的代表性仍然不足。

材料与方法

对通过电子住院医师申请服务系统提交给哥伦比亚大学泌尿外科系的2015年和2016年匹配申请进行了审查。评估了匹配的女性和男性泌尿外科申请者群体之间的差异。

结果

2015年有256名学生、2016年有259名学生向哥伦比亚大学提交了申请并完成了排名列表(分别占2015年全国申请者群体的60%和2016年的62%)。我们确实发现,总体男性申请者群体的荣誉数量略少(3项对2项,P = 0.02),而美国医学执照考试(USMLE)第一步的分数更高(238分对234分,P < 0.001)。匹配的男性和女性群体之间唯一其他具有统计学显著差异的是泌尿外科实习轮转的平均次数(男性为1.4[0.9]次,女性为1.18[0.8]次,P = 0.04)。

结论

总体而言,匹配的男性和女性申请者似乎具有非常相似的资质。男性的USMLE第一步分数更高,而女性的荣誉平均数量更多。这些数据支持了以下发现:在泌尿外科领域匹配成功的当代男性和女性住院医师候选人取得了相当的成绩,并且两个群体的住院医师选拔标准相似。

相似文献

1
Gender Differences in the Urology Residency Match-Does It Make a Difference?泌尿外科住院医师匹配中的性别差异——这有影响吗?
Urology. 2018 Jan;111:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?1990-2007 年神经外科住院医师匹配分析:申请人性别是否影响神经外科匹配结果?
J Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;129(2):282-289. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.JNS171831. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
3
Effect of United States Medical Licensing Examination Score Cutoffs on Recruitment of Underrepresented Applicants in the Urology Match.美国医师执照考试分数截点对泌尿科住院医师匹配中代表性不足申请人招募的影响。
Urology. 2024 May;187:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.11.036. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
4
Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.泌尿外科住院医师培训项目主任的选拔标准。
Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):731-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.041.
5
The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants.推荐信中存在性别偏见,这些推荐信是为泌尿科住院医师申请人撰写的。
Urology. 2019 Dec;134:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.065. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
Women in Urology Residency, 1978-2013: A Critical Look at Gender Representation in Our Specialty.1978 - 2013年泌尿外科住院医师中的女性:审视我们专业中的性别代表性
Urology. 2016 Jun;92:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.092. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.与独立外科住院医师培训项目排名选拔相关的申请人特征。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.021.
8
The Urology Applicant: An Analysis of Contemporary Urology Residency Candidates.泌尿外科申请者:当代泌尿外科住院医师候选人分析
Urology. 2018 May;115:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.065. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
USMLE Step 1 Scoring Changes and the Urology Residency Application Process: Program Directors' Perspectives.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)评分变化与泌尿外科住院医师申请流程:项目主任的观点
Urology. 2020 Nov;145:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
10
Exploring Recent Changes to the New Urology Residency Match.探讨新泌尿外科住院医师匹配的最新变化。
Urol Pract. 2024 Nov;11(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000645. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender bias in urology: The role of gender in selecting urology as a medical specialty.泌尿外科中的性别偏见:性别在选择泌尿外科作为医学专业方面所起的作用。
Urol Ann. 2025 Jan-Mar;17(1):17-25. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_65_24. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Methods to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion in Canadian urology programs.增加加拿大泌尿科项目公平性、多样性和包容性的方法。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Aug;17(8):255-262. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8224.
3
Women as Urologists in Saudi Arabia: Career Choice and Practice Challenges: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
沙特阿拉伯女性泌尿外科医生:职业选择与实践挑战:一项比较性横断面研究
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 27;15:273-289. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S412713. eCollection 2023.
4
Is Urology a gender-biased career choice? A survey-based study of the Italian medical students' perception of specialties.泌尿外科是一个存在性别偏见的职业选择吗?一项基于调查的关于意大利医学生对各专业认知的研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 29;9:962824. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.962824. eCollection 2022.
5
Systematic review of specialist selection methods with implications for diversity in the medical workforce.系统评价专科医生选拔方法及其对医疗队伍多样性的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 24;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02685-w.
6
Evaluating Urology Residency Applications: What Matters Most and What Comes Next?评估泌尿科住院医师申请:什么最重要,下一步是什么?
Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Aug 17;21(10):37. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00993-0.
7
Survey of Canadian urology programs: Which aspects of the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) application are the most important?加拿大泌尿外科住院医师培训项目调查:加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS)申请的哪些方面最为重要?
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jun;14(6):169-173. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6191.