Suppr超能文献

内镜逆行胰胆管造影失败后内镜超声引导下会师技术:哪种入路途径最佳?

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Rendezvous Technique after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Which Approach Route Is the Best?

作者信息

Okuno Nozomi, Hara Kazuo, Mizuno Nobumasa, Hijioka Susumu, Tajika Masahiro, Tanaka Tsutomu, Ishihara Makoto, Hirayama Yutaka, Onishi Sachiyo, Niwa Yasumasa, Yamao Kenji

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.

Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;56(23):3135-3143. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8677-16. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Abstract

Objective The endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique (EUS-RV) is a salvage method for failed selective biliary cannulation. Three puncture routes have been reported, with many comparisons between the intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic biliary ducts. We used the trans-esophagus (TE) and trans-jejunum (TJ) routes. In the present study, the utility of EUS-RV for biliary access was evaluated, focusing on the approach routes. Methods and Patients In 39 patients, 42 puncture routes were evaluated in detail. EUS-RV was performed between January 2010 and December 2014. The patients were prospectively enrolled, and their clinical data were retrospectively collected. Results The patients' median age was 71 (range 29-84) years. The indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were malignant biliary obstruction in 24 patients and benign biliary disease in 15. The technical success rate was 78.6% (33/42) and was similar among approach routes (p=0.377). The overall complication rate was 16.7% (7/42) and was similar among approach routes (p=0.489). However, mediastinal emphysema occurred in 2 TE route EUS-RV patients. No EUS-RV-related deaths occurred. Conclusion EUS-RV proved reliable after failed ERCP. The selection of the appropriate route based on the patient's condition is crucial.

摘要

目的 内镜超声引导会师技术(EUS-RV)是一种用于选择性胆管插管失败的挽救方法。已报道了三种穿刺途径,对肝内胆管和肝外胆管进行了多次比较。我们采用经食管(TE)和经空肠(TJ)途径。在本研究中,重点关注穿刺途径,评估了EUS-RV用于胆管通路的实用性。

方法与患者 对39例患者的42条穿刺途径进行了详细评估。EUS-RV于2010年1月至2014年12月期间进行。患者为前瞻性纳入,其临床资料进行回顾性收集。

结果 患者的中位年龄为71岁(范围29 - 84岁)。内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的适应证为恶性胆管梗阻24例,良性胆道疾病15例。技术成功率为78.6%(33/42),各穿刺途径间相似(p = 0.377)。总体并发症发生率为16.7%(7/42),各穿刺途径间相似(p = 0.489)。然而,2例经TE途径的EUS-RV患者发生了纵隔气肿。未发生与EUS-RV相关的死亡。

结论 ERCP失败后,EUS-RV被证明是可靠的。根据患者情况选择合适的途径至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d8/5742383/1a6342c4ab16/1349-7235-56-3135-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验