Josephson Colin B, Gonzalez-Izquierdo Arturo, Denaxas Spiros, Fitzpatrick Natalie K, Sajobi Tolulope T, Engbers Jordan D T, Patten Scott, Jette Nathalie, Wiebe Samuel
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Epilepsia. 2017 Nov;58(11):2002-2009. doi: 10.1111/epi.13904. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
Preliminary evidence suggests that serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) use may increase postictal respiratory drive and prevent death. We sought to determine whether SRIs are associated with improved all-cause and possible seizure-specific mortality in patients with epilepsy.
Patients with epilepsy and a random 10:1 sample without epilepsy were extracted from The ClinicAl research using LInked Bespoke studies and Electronic health Records (CALIBER) resource. The hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause and possible seizure-specific mortality, treating SRI use as a time-varying covariate, was determined using the date of a second SRI prescription as exposure and in discrete 6-month periods over the entire duration of follow-up. We used Cox regression and competing risk models with Firth correction to calculate the HR. We controlled for age, sex, depression, comorbidity, (Charlson comorbidity index) and socioeconomic status (Index of Multiple Deprivation).
We identified 2,718,952 eligible patients in CALIBER, of whom 16,379 (0.60%) had epilepsy. Median age and follow-up were 44 (interquartile range [IQR] 29-61]) and 6.4 years (IQR 2.4-10.4 years), respectively, and 53% were female. A total of 2,178 patients (13%) had at least two SRI prescriptions. Hazard of all-cause mortality was significantly elevated following a second prescription for an SRI (HR 1.64 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.44-1.86; p < 0.001). The HR was similar in 163,778 age, sex, and general practitioner (GP) practice-matched controls without epilepsy. Exposure to an SRI was not associated with seizure-related death (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.59-1.97; 0.796).
There is no evidence in this large population-based cohort that SRIs protect against all-cause mortality or seizure-specific mortality. Rather, SRI use was associated with increased mortality, irrespective of epilepsy, which is probably due to various factors associated with the use of antidepressants. Larger studies with systematically collected clinical data are needed to shed further light on these findings.
初步证据表明,使用5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SRI)可能会增加发作后呼吸驱动力并预防死亡。我们试图确定SRI是否与癫痫患者全因死亡率及可能的癫痫特异性死亡率的改善相关。
从使用定制关联研究和电子健康记录(CALIBER)资源的临床研究中提取癫痫患者以及随机抽取的10:1比例的非癫痫患者样本。将第二次开具SRI处方的日期作为暴露因素,并在整个随访期间按6个月的离散时间段,将SRI的使用作为一个随时间变化的协变量,来确定全因死亡率和可能的癫痫特异性死亡率的风险比(HR)。我们使用Cox回归和带有Firth校正的竞争风险模型来计算HR。我们对年龄、性别、抑郁、合并症(查尔森合并症指数)和社会经济地位(多重剥夺指数)进行了控制。
我们在CALIBER中确定了2,718,952名符合条件的患者,其中16,379名(0.60%)患有癫痫。年龄中位数和随访时间分别为44岁(四分位间距[IQR]29 - 61岁)和6.4年(IQR 2.4 - 10.4年),53%为女性。共有2,178名患者(13%)至少有两次SRI处方。第二次开具SRI处方后,全因死亡风险显著升高(HR 1.64,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.44 - 1.86;p < 0.001)。在163,778名年龄、性别和全科医生(GP)诊疗匹配的非癫痫对照中,HR相似。暴露于SRI与癫痫相关死亡无关(HR 1.08,95%CI 0.59 - 1.97;p = 0.796)。
在这个基于人群的大型队列中,没有证据表明SRI能预防全因死亡率或癫痫特异性死亡率。相反,无论是否患有癫痫,使用SRI都与死亡率增加相关,这可能是由于与使用抗抑郁药相关的各种因素所致。需要开展更大规模的、系统收集临床数据的研究,以进一步阐明这些发现。