• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用系统综述进行职业安全与健康研究。

Using systematic review in occupational safety and health.

机构信息

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2017 Nov;60(11):921-929. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22771. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.22771
PMID:28944489
Abstract

Evaluation of scientific evidence is critical in developing recommendations to reduce risk. Healthcare was the first scientific field to employ a systematic review approach for synthesizing research findings to support evidence-based decision-making and it is still the largest producer and consumer of systematic reviews. Systematic reviews in the field of occupational safety and health are being conducted, but more widespread use and adoption would strengthen assessments. In 2016, NIOSH asked RAND to develop a framework for applying the traditional systematic review elements to the field of occupational safety and health. This paper describes how essential systematic review elements can be adapted for use in occupational systematic reviews to enhance their scientific quality, objectivity, transparency, reliability, utility, and acceptability.

摘要

评价科学证据对于制定风险降低建议至关重要。医疗保健是第一个采用系统综述方法来综合研究结果以支持循证决策的科学领域,它仍然是系统综述的最大生产者和使用者。职业安全与健康领域正在进行系统综述,但更广泛的使用和采用将加强评估。2016 年,NIOSH 要求 RAND 为职业安全与健康领域制定一个应用传统系统综述要素的框架。本文描述了如何适应职业系统综述中使用的基本系统综述要素,以提高其科学质量、客观性、透明度、可靠性、实用性和可接受性。

相似文献

1
Using systematic review in occupational safety and health.使用系统综述进行职业安全与健康研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Nov;60(11):921-929. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22771. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments.基于文献的环境卫生科学评估的系统评价与证据整合。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jul;122(7):711-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307972. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.英国卫生技术评估系统评价的性质和报告特征。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 8;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0498-6.
7
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.系统评价的总结:伞状综述方法的方法学发展、实施与报告
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Towards a framework for systematic reviews of the prevalence of exposure to environmental and occupational risk factors.针对环境和职业风险因素暴露的普遍性进行系统综述的框架。
Environ Health. 2022 Jul 6;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00878-4.
10
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估 - 第 7 篇:了解传播偏倚的潜在影响。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0694-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to improve the translation of evidence-based interventions: A primer on dissemination and implementation science for occupational safety and health researchers and practitioners.改善循证干预措施翻译的方法:职业安全与健康研究人员及从业者的传播与实施科学入门
Saf Sci. 2022 Aug;152. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105763. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Applying Translational Science Approaches to Protect Workers Exposed to Nanomaterials.应用转化科学方法保护接触纳米材料的工人。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;10:816578. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.816578. eCollection 2022.
3
Dissemination and Implementation Science Approaches for Occupational Safety and Health Research: Implications for Advancing Total Worker Health.
职业安全与健康研究的传播与实施科学方法:对推进全面劳动者健康的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;18(21):11050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111050.
4
Challenges and recommendations on the conduct of systematic reviews of observational epidemiologic studies in environmental and occupational health.环境与职业健康领域观察性流行病学研究系统评价实施的挑战与建议。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;31(1):21-30. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0228-0. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Systematic Reviews in Occupational Health and Safety: where are we and where should we go?职业健康与安全系统评价:我们现在何处,又应去往何方?
Med Lav. 2019 Oct 29;110(5):331-341. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i5.8952.
6
Quantitative Measures of Physical Risk Factors Associated with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Elbow: A Systematic Review.与肘部工作相关肌肉骨骼障碍相关的物理风险因素的定量测量:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 5;16(1):130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010130.
7
Blue-collar work and women's health: A systematic review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015.蓝领工作与女性健康:对1990年至2015年证据的系统综述
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Aug 18;6:195-244. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Translation research in occupational safety and health: A proposed framework.职业安全与健康翻译研究:一个建议框架。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Dec;60(12):1011-1022. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22780. Epub 2017 Oct 9.