College of Electrical Engineering, Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China.
Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Science of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Mol Med Rep. 2017 Dec;16(6):7967-7978. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7608. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Breast cancer metastasis is a demanding problem in clinical treatment of patients with breast cancer. It is necessary to examine the mechanisms of metastasis for developing therapies. Classification of the aggressiveness of breast cancer is an important issue in biological study and for clinical decisions. Although aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cells can be easily distinguished among different cell lines, it is very difficult to distinguish in clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to use the gene expression analysis from breast cancer cell lines to predict clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer. Weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA) is a powerful method to account for correlations between genes and extract co‑expressed modules of genes from large expression datasets. Therefore, WGCNA was applied to explore the differences in sub‑networks between aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines. The greatest difference topological overlap networks in both groups include potential information to understand the mechanisms of aggressiveness. The results show that the blue and red modules were significantly associated with the biological processes of aggressiveness. The sub‑network, which consisted of TMEM47, GJC1, ANXA3, TWIST1 and C19orf33 in the blue module, was associated with an aggressive phenotype. The sub‑network of LOC100653217, CXCL12, SULF1, DOK5 and DKK3 in the red module was associated with a non‑aggressive phenotype. In order to validate the hazard ratio of these genes, the prognostic index was constructed to integrate them and examined using data from the Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Patients with breast cancer from TCGA in the high‑risk group had a significantly shorter overall survival time compared with patients in the low‑risk group (hazard ratio=1.231, 95% confidence interval=1.058‑1.433, P=0.0071, by the Wald test). A similar result was produced from the GEO database. The findings may provide a novel strategy for measuring cancer aggressiveness in patients with breast cancer.
乳腺癌转移是乳腺癌患者临床治疗中的一个难题。有必要研究转移的机制,以开发治疗方法。乳腺癌侵袭性的分类是生物学研究和临床决策中的一个重要问题。虽然在不同的细胞系中可以很容易地区分侵袭性和非侵袭性乳腺癌细胞,但在临床实践中却非常困难。本研究旨在利用乳腺癌细胞系的基因表达分析来预测乳腺癌患者的临床结局。加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)是一种强大的方法,可以解释基因之间的相关性,并从大型表达数据集提取共表达的基因模块。因此,应用 WGCNA 来探索侵袭性和非侵袭性乳腺癌细胞系之间的亚网络差异。两组之间差异最大的拓扑重叠网络包含了理解侵袭性机制的潜在信息。结果表明,蓝色和红色模块与侵袭性的生物学过程显著相关。蓝色模块中由 TMEM47、GJC1、ANXA3、TWIST1 和 C19orf33 组成的子网络与侵袭性表型相关。红色模块中由 LOC100653217、CXCL12、SULF1、DOK5 和 DKK3 组成的子网络与非侵袭性表型相关。为了验证这些基因的危险比,构建了预后指数来整合它们,并使用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)和基因表达综合数据库(GEO)的数据进行检验。TCGA 中高危组的乳腺癌患者总生存时间明显短于低危组(危险比=1.231,95%置信区间=1.058-1.433,P=0.0071,Wald 检验)。GEO 数据库也得到了类似的结果。这些发现可能为测量乳腺癌患者的癌症侵袭性提供一种新策略。