Terri Rebmann, PhD, RN, CIC, is Professor and Director, Institute for Biosecurity, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Travis M. Loux, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; both are in the College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO. John Anthony, MT(ASCP), CIC, is Emergency Preparedness Manager; Julia Mulroy is an intern; and Rikki Sitzes, MPH, CDP, is an Emergency Response Planner; all in the Communicable Disease Control Services, St. Louis County Department of Health, Clayton, MO.
Health Secur. 2017 Sep/Oct;15(5):539-547. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0125. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Little is known about closed point-of-dispensing (POD) site preparedness-especially how these entities progress in their preparedness efforts over time. The purpose of this study was to assess the preparedness of a closed POD network. Between 2012 and 2016, 30% to 50% of POD entities in the St. Louis County region were assessed each year, for a total of 138 site evaluations from 62 entities. The assessment tool included 41 components of closed POD preparedness, each scored either 0 = not met or 1 = met. POD preparedness scores could range from 0 to 41. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare the percentage of entities that had each preparedness indicator. A multilevel linear model with a random intercept for each agency was used to model longitudinal changes in closed POD preparedness. POD preparedness scores were higher in 2016 than in 2012 (31.5 vs. 26.5, t = 14.3, p < .001); however, there was a negative yearly trend in preparedness, and, on average, entities met only 65.4% of the preparedness indicators. Only a third of entities reported hosting a POD exercise at least once every 2 years (32.3%, n = 20). From the multilevel regression, determinants of better POD preparedness include having been assessed more often, employing a business continuity expert, and not being a long-term care agency. Closed POD entities should continue to work toward better preparedness, to better ensure successful deployment. Findings from this study indicate that more frequent assessments likely enhance preparedness at closed POD entities.
关于封闭的即需即取(POD)点准备情况,人们知之甚少——尤其是这些实体如何随着时间的推移在其准备工作中取得进展。本研究的目的是评估封闭 POD 网络的准备情况。在 2012 年至 2016 年期间,每年评估圣路易斯县地区 30%至 50%的 POD 实体,共有来自 62 个实体的 138 个地点评估。评估工具包括 41 个封闭 POD 准备情况的组成部分,每个组成部分的得分要么为 0(未达到),要么为 1(达到)。POD 准备得分范围从 0 到 41。采用卡方检验比较每个实体具备的每个准备指标的百分比。采用具有每个机构随机截距的多级线性模型来模拟封闭 POD 准备情况的纵向变化。2016 年的 POD 准备得分高于 2012 年(31.5 对 26.5,t=14.3,p<.001);然而,准备情况呈负年趋势,平均而言,实体仅满足了 65.4%的准备指标。只有三分之一的实体报告每两年至少举办一次 POD 演习(32.3%,n=20)。从多级回归中,更好的 POD 准备的决定因素包括更频繁地接受评估、聘请业务连续性专家以及不是长期护理机构。封闭的 POD 实体应继续努力提高准备工作水平,以更好地确保成功部署。本研究的结果表明,更频繁的评估可能会提高封闭的 POD 实体的准备程度。