• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国疫苗接种点工作人员及志愿者的感染预防与大规模疫苗接种培训:一项全国性研究

Infection prevention and mass vaccination training for U.S. point of dispensing staff and volunteers: a national study.

作者信息

Rebmann Terri, Loux Travis M, Zink Thomas K, Swick Zachary, Wakefield Mary

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Institute for Biosecurity, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.

Department of Biostatistics, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2015 Mar 1;43(3):222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.012. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.012
PMID:25637434
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Points of dispensing (PODs) are deployed for medical countermeasure mass dispensing. However, infection prevention and vaccine administration pre-event training offered and just-in-time (JIT) education planned for POD workers have not been assessed.

METHODS

Disaster planners were sent an online questionnaire in 2013. McNemar tests compared training offered to staff versus volunteers and pre-event training versus JIT training.

RESULTS

In total, 301 disaster planners participated. The most frequent pre-event training included hand hygiene (59.1% and 28.0%) and personal protective equipment (PPE) selection (52.1% and 24.1%) for staff and volunteers, respectively. Few provided pre-event training on the cold chain technique (14.8% and 5.1%) or smallpox vaccine administration (4.7% and 2.3%) for staff or volunteers. For all topics except smallpox vaccine administration, more staff than volunteers received pre-event training (P < .01). The most frequent planned JIT training includes hand hygiene (79.8% and 73.5%) and PPE selection (79.4% and 70.0%) to staff and volunteers. For all topics, more JIT education is planned for staff than volunteers (P < .001). More JIT training is planned than has been given pre-event for all topics (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

More pre-event training is needed on infection prevention and vaccine administration to ensure safe and successful POD deployment.

摘要

背景

分发点(PODs)用于医疗对策的大规模分发。然而,针对分发点工作人员提供的感染预防和疫苗接种事前培训以及计划中的即时(JIT)教育尚未得到评估。

方法

2013年向灾难规划者发送了一份在线调查问卷。采用McNemar检验比较向工作人员与志愿者提供的培训以及事前培训与即时培训。

结果

共有301名灾难规划者参与。最常见的事前培训分别包括针对工作人员和志愿者的手部卫生(59.1%和28.0%)以及个人防护装备(PPE)选择(52.1%和24.1%)。很少有机构针对工作人员或志愿者提供冷链技术(14.8%和5.1%)或天花疫苗接种(4.7%和2.3%)的事前培训。除天花疫苗接种外,所有主题中,接受事前培训的工作人员比志愿者更多(P <.01)。最常见的计划即时培训包括针对工作人员和志愿者的手部卫生(79.8%和73.5%)以及PPE选择(79.4%和70.0%)。对于所有主题,计划为工作人员提供的即时教育比志愿者更多(P <.001)。所有主题计划的即时培训都比事前培训更多(P <.001)。

结论

需要在感染预防和疫苗接种方面开展更多事前培训,以确保安全、成功地部署分发点。

相似文献

1
Infection prevention and mass vaccination training for U.S. point of dispensing staff and volunteers: a national study.美国疫苗接种点工作人员及志愿者的感染预防与大规模疫苗接种培训:一项全国性研究
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Mar 1;43(3):222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.012. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
2
US disaster planners' attitudes regarding preevent vaccine for first responders and point-of-dispensing workers.美国灾难规划者对一线救援人员和分发点工作人员进行预先事件疫苗接种的态度。
Health Secur. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1089/hs.2014.0066. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
3
A national study examining closed points of dispensing (PODs): existence, preparedness, exercise participation, and training provided.一项关于检查配药点(PODs)封闭情况的全国性研究:配药点的存在情况、准备情况、参与演练情况以及所提供的培训。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Jul-Aug;12(4):208-16. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2014.0014. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
4
Are US jurisdictions prepared to dispense medical countermeasures through open points of dispensing? Findings from a national study.美国司法管辖区是否准备通过开放式分发点分发医疗对策?一项全国性研究的结果。
Health Secur. 2015 Mar-Apr;13(2):96-105. doi: 10.1089/hs.2014.0080. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
US Civilian Smallpox Preparedness and Response Program, 2003.美国平民天花防范与应对计划,2003年
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;46 Suppl 3:S157-67. doi: 10.1086/524751.
6
The South Dakota Model: Health Care Professions Student Disaster Preparedness and Deployment Training.南达科他州模式:医疗保健专业学生灾难防范与部署培训
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Dec;11(6):735-740. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.116. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
7
Approaches, Successes, and Challenges in Recruiting Closed Points of Dispensing Sites: A Qualitative Study.招募配药点封闭点的方法、成功经验与挑战:一项定性研究
Health Secur. 2021 May-Jun;19(3):327-337. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0219. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
8
Infection prevention in points of dispensing.配药点的感染预防。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Nov;37(9):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.001.
9
2015 Pandemic Influenza Readiness Assessment Among US Public Health Emergency Preparedness Awardees.2015年美国公共卫生应急准备获奖者的大流行性流感准备情况评估
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S177-S179. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303952.
10
Assessment of Closed Point-of-Dispensing (POD) Preparedness in St. Louis County, Missouri, 2012-2016.2012-2016 年密苏里州圣路易斯县封闭型即需即配(POD)准备情况评估
Health Secur. 2017 Sep/Oct;15(5):539-547. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0125. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
[Hospital surge capacity volunteers in an emergency: a scoping review].[急诊中医院应急能力志愿者:一项范围综述]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01587-6.
2
Challenges in managing, sustaining, and assessing closed point of dispensing sites: Findings from a qualitative study.管理、维持和评估封闭配药点的挑战:一项定性研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271037. eCollection 2022.
3
Challenges and Opportunities of Mass Vaccination Centers in COVID-19 Times: A Rapid Review of Literature.
新冠疫情时期大规模疫苗接种中心面临的挑战与机遇:文献快速综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;9(6):574. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060574.
4
Use of Medical Countermeasures in Small-Scale Emergency Responses.在小规模应急响应中使用医疗对策。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(S3):S196-S201. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304491.