• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ESMO-临床获益量表 1.1 版

ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.

机构信息

Cancer Pain and Palliative Medicine Service, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel;.

Laboratory of Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens & Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdx310
PMID:28945867
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) version 1.0 (v1.0) was published in May 2015 and was the first version of a validated and reproducible tool to assess the magnitude of clinical benefit from new cancer therapies. The ESMO-MCBS was designed to be a dynamic tool with planned revisions and updates based upon recognition of expanding needs and shortcomings identified since the last review.

METHODS

The revision process for the ESMO-MCBS incorporates a nine-step process: Careful review of critiques and suggestions, and identification of problems in the application of v1.0; Identification of shortcomings for revision in the upcoming version; Proposal and evaluation of solutions to address identified shortcomings; Field testing of solutions; Preparation of a near-final revised version for peer review for reasonableness by members of the ESMO Faculty and Guidelines Committee; Amendments based on peer review for reasonableness; Near-final review by members of the ESMO-MCBS Working Group and the ESMO Executive Board; Final amendments; Final review and approval by members of the ESMO-MCBS Working Group and the ESMO Executive Board.

RESULTS

Twelve issues for revision or amendment were proposed for consideration; proposed amendments were formulated for eight identified shortcomings. The proposed amendments are classified as either structural, technical, immunotherapy triggered or nuanced. All amendments were field tested in a wide range of studies comparing scores generated with ESMO-MCBS v1.0 and version 1.1 (v1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

ESMO-MCBS v1.1 incorporates 10 revisions and will allow for scoring of single-arm studies. Scoring remains very stable; revisions in v1.1 alter the scores of only 12 out of 118 comparative studies and facilitate scoring for single-arm studies.

摘要

背景

ESMO 临床受益度量量表(ESMO-MCBS)版本 1.0(v1.0)于 2015 年 5 月发布,是首个经过验证和可重复使用的工具,用于评估新癌症疗法的临床受益程度。ESMO-MCBS 的设计是一个动态工具,计划根据上次审查以来认识到的扩展需求和发现的缺陷进行修订和更新。

方法

ESMO-MCBS 的修订过程包括九个步骤:仔细审查批评和建议,并确定 v1.0 应用中的问题;确定即将发布的版本中需要修订的缺陷;提出并评估解决已确定缺陷的方案;对解决方案进行现场测试;为 ESMO 教师和指南委员会成员进行同行评审准备近乎最终修订版本,以评估合理性;根据同行评审的合理性进行修订;由 ESMO-MCBS 工作组和 ESMO 执行委员会成员进行最终审查;最终修正案;ESMO-MCBS 工作组和 ESMO 执行委员会成员的最终审查和批准。

结果

提出了 12 个修订或修正的问题供考虑;为确定的 8 个缺陷提出了修正建议。拟议的修正案分为结构、技术、免疫治疗触发或细微差别。所有修正案都在广泛的研究中进行了现场测试,比较了使用 ESMO-MCBS v1.0 和版本 1.1(v1.1)生成的分数。

结论

ESMO-MCBS v1.1 包含 10 项修订,将允许对单臂研究进行评分。评分仍然非常稳定;v1.1 中的修订仅改变了 118 项比较研究中的 12 项评分,并为单臂研究的评分提供了便利。

相似文献

1
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.ESMO-临床获益量表 1.1 版
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310.
2
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0.ESMO 血液系统恶性肿瘤临床获益量表(ESMO-MCBS:H)版本 1.0。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(9):734-771. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
3
EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for haematological malignancies.欧洲血液学协会(EHA)对欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床获益程度量表1.1版(ESMO-MCBS v1.1)用于血液系统恶性肿瘤的评估。
ESMO Open. 2020 Jan;5(1). doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000611.
4
Evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer.评估 ESMO-MCBS v1.1 版(ESMO-MCBS v1.1)在乳腺癌辅助放疗中的应用。
ESMO Open. 2023 Jun;8(3):101206. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101206. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale.采用 ASCO 价值框架和 ESMO 临床获益量表比较免疫检查点抑制剂与非免疫检查点抑制剂抗癌药物临床试验中的长期生存获益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6803.
6
Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring.研究设计、实施和数据分析中的偏倚会扭曲对临床获益的评估和 ESMO-MCBS 评分。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100117. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100117. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score.使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale 版本 1.1 和 ASCO 价值框架净健康获益评分对临床获益进行比较评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):336-349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00729. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Lessons learnt from scoring adjuvant colon cancer trials and meta-analyses using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale V.1.1.从使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale V.1.1 对辅助结肠癌试验和荟萃分析进行评分中学到的经验。
ESMO Open. 2020 Sep;5(5):e000681. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000681.
9
Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit.有资格获得欧洲肿瘤内科学会-临床获益幅度评分(ESMO-MCBS)积分的生存质量数据的方法学和报告标准。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Apr;34(4):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
10
Analyzing the clinical benefit of newer therapies for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: application of the ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale v1.1.分析新型疗法对晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的临床获益:应用 ESMO 临床获益量表 v1.1。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Sep;60(9):1225-1232. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1942546. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient, Physician, and Assessor Blinding in Phase III Randomized Trials in Oncology: A Meta-Epidemiological Analysis.肿瘤学III期随机试验中的患者、医生和评估者设盲:一项Meta流行病学分析
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71097. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71097.
2
Associations between clinical benefits of cancer drugs and incremental quality-adjusted life years used in reimbursement decisions in Australia, Canada, England and China: an observational study.澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和中国用于报销决策的癌症药物临床益处与增量质量调整生命年之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e101678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101678.
3
Integrating Quality of Life and Survival in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.
晚期肝细胞癌系统治疗中生活质量与生存的整合:一项网状Meta分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2470.
4
Survival-inferred fragility of statistical significance in phase III oncology trials.III期肿瘤试验中具有统计学意义的生存推断脆弱性
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;9(1):256. doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01024-2.
5
Predictors of withdrawal of anticancer drug indications granted accelerated approval: a retrospective cohort study.获批加速批准的抗癌药物适应症撤销的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 31;84:103088. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103088. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Reproducibility of statistically significant phase III oncology trials: An In Silico meta-epidemiological analysis.具有统计学意义的III期肿瘤学试验的可重复性:一项计算机模拟的meta-流行病学分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Jul 4;226:115596. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115596.
7
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials and in clinical practice: report from the XXI national conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).临床试验和临床实践中的患者报告结局(PROs):来自意大利医学肿瘤学会(AIOM)第21届全国会议的报告
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;4(1):e000783. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783. eCollection 2025.
8
Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project.消除欧洲医疗体系中的不平等现象:BEACON项目。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 5;13:1520772. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1520772. eCollection 2025.
9
Pan-Asia adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer.泛亚地区改编的欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)新诊断和复发上皮性卵巢癌患者管理临床实践指南。
ESMO Open. 2025 Jun;10(6):105125. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105125. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
10
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey Exploring Practice Patterns and Preferences of Uro-Oncologists in Northeast Italy.老年患者前列腺癌的诊断与治疗:一项探索意大利东北部泌尿肿瘤学家实践模式和偏好的横断面调查。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;15(9):1100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091100.