• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ESMO 血液系统恶性肿瘤临床获益量表(ESMO-MCBS:H)版本 1.0。

ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0.

机构信息

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Laboratory of Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens; Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(9):734-771. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

DOI:
10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.002
PMID:37343663
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been accepted as a robust tool to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in trials for oncological therapies. However, the ESMO-MCBS hitherto has only been validated for solid tumours. With the rapid development of novel therapies for haematological malignancies, we aimed to develop an ESMO-MCBS version that is specifically designed and validated for haematological malignancies.

METHODS

ESMO and the European Hematology Association (EHA) initiated a collaboration to develop a version for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H). The process incorporated five landmarks: field testing of the ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) to identify shortcomings specific to haematological diseases, drafting of the ESMO-MCBS:H forms, peer review and revision of the draft based on re-scoring (resulting in a second draft), assessment of reasonableness of the scores generated, final review and approval by ESMO and EHA including executive boards.

RESULTS

Based on the field testing results of 80 haematological trials and extensive review for feasibility and reasonableness, five amendments to ESMO-MCBS were incorporated in the ESMO-MCBS:H addressing the identified shortcomings. These concerned mainly clinical trial endpoints that differ in haematology versus solid oncology and the very indolent nature of nevertheless incurable diseases such as follicular lymphoma, which hampers presentation of mature data. In addition, general changes incorporated in the draft version of the ESMO-MCBS v2 were included, and specific forms for haematological malignancies generated. Here we present the final approved forms of the ESMO-MCBS:H, including instructions.

CONCLUSION

The haematology-specific version ESMO-MCBS:H allows now full applicability of the scale for evaluating the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from clinical studies in haematological malignancies.

摘要

背景

欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)-临床获益幅度量表(MCBS)已被接受为评估肿瘤治疗临床试验报告的临床获益幅度的有力工具。然而,ESMO-MCBS 迄今为止仅在实体瘤中得到验证。随着新型血液恶性肿瘤治疗方法的快速发展,我们旨在开发一种专门针对血液恶性肿瘤的 ESMO-MCBS 版本。

方法

ESMO 和欧洲血液学协会(EHA)合作开发血液恶性肿瘤版本(ESMO-MCBS:H)。该过程包括五个里程碑:现场测试 ESMO-MCBS 版本 1.1(v1.1),以确定特定于血液疾病的缺点,起草 ESMO-MCBS:H 表格,根据重新评分对草稿进行同行评审和修订(导致第二稿),评估生成的分数的合理性,ESMO 和 EHA 包括执行委员会的最终审查和批准。

结果

根据 80 项血液学试验的现场测试结果和对可行性和合理性的广泛审查,对 ESMO-MCBS 进行了五项修订,纳入了 ESMO-MCBS:H,以解决已确定的缺点。这些主要涉及血液学与实体肿瘤临床试验终点的不同,以及滤泡性淋巴瘤等不可治愈疾病的惰性性质,这阻碍了成熟数据的呈现。此外,还纳入了 ESMO-MCBS 第二版草案中包含的一般变更,并生成了血液恶性肿瘤的特定表格。在这里,我们展示了最终批准的 ESMO-MCBS:H 表格,包括说明。

结论

血液学专用版 ESMO-MCBS:H 现在允许充分应用该量表评估来自血液恶性肿瘤临床研究的临床获益幅度。

相似文献

1
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0.ESMO 血液系统恶性肿瘤临床获益量表(ESMO-MCBS:H)版本 1.0。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(9):734-771. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for haematological malignancies.欧洲血液学协会(EHA)对欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床获益程度量表1.1版(ESMO-MCBS v1.1)用于血液系统恶性肿瘤的评估。
ESMO Open. 2020 Jan;5(1). doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000611.
3
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.ESMO-临床获益量表 1.1 版
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310.
4
Evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer.评估 ESMO-MCBS v1.1 版(ESMO-MCBS v1.1)在乳腺癌辅助放疗中的应用。
ESMO Open. 2023 Jun;8(3):101206. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101206. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale.采用 ASCO 价值框架和 ESMO 临床获益量表比较免疫检查点抑制剂与非免疫检查点抑制剂抗癌药物临床试验中的长期生存获益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6803.
6
Five years of EMA-approved systemic cancer therapies for solid tumours-a comparison of two thresholds for meaningful clinical benefit.欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的用于实体瘤的五年全身癌症治疗——两种有意义临床获益阈值的比较
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score.使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale 版本 1.1 和 ASCO 价值框架净健康获益评分对临床获益进行比较评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):336-349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00729. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010-2019.2010-2019 年在瑞士获批的癌症药物的临床获益。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0268545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268545. eCollection 2022.
9
Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring.研究设计、实施和数据分析中的偏倚会扭曲对临床获益的评估和 ESMO-MCBS 评分。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100117. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100117. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Lessons learnt from scoring adjuvant colon cancer trials and meta-analyses using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale V.1.1.从使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale V.1.1 对辅助结肠癌试验和荟萃分析进行评分中学到的经验。
ESMO Open. 2020 Sep;5(5):e000681. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000681.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of withdrawal of anticancer drug indications granted accelerated approval: a retrospective cohort study.获批加速批准的抗癌药物适应症撤销的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 31;84:103088. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103088. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Factors in Time to Full Approval or Withdrawal for Anticancer Medicines Granted Accelerated Approval by the FDA.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)加速批准的抗癌药物完全获批或撤回所需时间的影响因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252026. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2026.
3
Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在接受新辅助化疗的胃癌患者中的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):4477-4488. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4477.
4
A systematic review of health-related quality of life outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib.帕博西尼治疗晚期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量结局的系统评价。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Oct;13(10):e240111. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0111. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
The Role of Medical Societies and the Relevance of Clinical Perspective in the Evolving EU HTA Process: Insights Generated at the 2023 Fall Convention and Survey of the European Access Academy.医学协会的作用以及临床视角在不断发展的欧盟卫生技术评估过程中的相关性:在2023年秋季大会及欧洲准入学会调查中获得的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jun 22;12(3):128-143. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030011. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Application of the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale to assess the clinical benefit of antibody drug conjugates in solid cancer: a systematic descriptive analysis of phase III and pivotal phase II trials.应用 ESMO 临床获益量表评估抗体药物偶联物在实体瘤中的临床获益:对 III 期和关键 II 期试验的系统描述性分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 8;14(6):e077108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077108.
7
List prices and clinical value of anticancer drugs in China, Japan, and South Korea: a retrospective comparative study.中国、日本和韩国抗癌药物的标价与临床价值:一项回顾性比较研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 May 16;47:101088. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101088. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators.为成功实施欧盟卫生技术评估法规开展包容性公民社会对话:呼吁采取行动确保利益相关者和合作伙伴的适当参与。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Mar 14;12(1):21-34. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12010004. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Patient-reported outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma trials: a systematic review.霍奇金淋巴瘤试验中患者报告的结局:一项系统评价
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 13;14:1353101. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1353101. eCollection 2024.
10
Characteristics of clinician input in Canadian funding decisions for cancer drugs: a cross-sectional study based on CADTH reimbursement recommendations.加拿大癌症药物资助决策中临床医生投入的特点:基于 CADTH 报销建议的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;13(10):e066378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066378.