1Department of Neurosurgery, Georg-August-University Göttingen; and.
2Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH University, Aachen, Germany.
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;129(1):84-90. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.JNS162505. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
OBJECTIVE Clipping of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm requires some degree of vessel manipulation, which in turn is believed to contribute to vasoconstriction. One of the techniques used during surgery is temporary clipping of the parent vessel. Temporary clipping may either be mandatory in cases of premature rupture (rescue) or represent a precautionary or facilitating surgical step (elective). The aim of this study was to study the association between temporary clipping during aneurysm surgery and the incidence of vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in a large clinical series. METHODS Seven hundred seventy-eight patients who underwent surgical aneurysm treatment after aSAH were retrospectively included in the study. In addition to surgical parameters, the authors recorded transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography-documented vasospasm (TCD-vasospasm, blood flow acceleration > 120 cm/sec), delayed ischemic neurological deficits (DINDs), and delayed cerebral infarction (DCI). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the association between temporary clipping, vasospasm, DIND, and DCI. RESULTS Temporary clipping was performed in 338 (43.4%) of 778 patients during aneurysm surgery. TCD sonographic flow acceleration developed in 370 (47.6%), DINDs in 123 (15.8%), and DCI in 97 (12.5%). Patients with temporary clipping showed no significant increase in the incidence of TCD-vasospasm compared with patients without temporary clipping (49% vs 48%, respectively; p = 0.60). DINDs developed in 12% of patients with temporary clipping and 18% of those without temporary clipping (p = 0.01). DCI occurred in 9% of patients with temporary clipping and 15% of those without temporary clipping (p = 0.02). The need for rescue temporary clipping was a predictor for DCI; 19.5% of patients in the rescue temporary clipping group but only 11.3% in the elective temporary clipping group had infarcts (p = 0.02). Elective temporary clipping was not associated with TCD-vasospasm (p = 0.31), DIND (p = 0.18), or DCI (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Temporary clipping did not contribute to a higher rate of TCD-vasospasm, DIND, or DCI in comparison with rates in patients without temporary clipping. In contrast, there was an association between temporary clipping and a lower incidence of DINDs and DCI. There is no reason to be hesitant in using elective temporary clipping if deemed appropriate.
目的 夹闭破裂的颅内动脉瘤需要对血管进行一定程度的操作,而这种操作被认为会导致血管收缩。手术中使用的技术之一是暂时夹闭母血管。在动脉瘤破裂(抢救)的情况下,暂时夹闭可能是必需的,或者代表预防性或促进性的手术步骤(选择性)。本研究的目的是在大型临床系列中研究动脉瘤手术后暂时夹闭与蛛网膜下腔出血后(aSAH)的血管痉挛和迟发性脑缺血(DCI)发生率之间的关系。
方法 本研究回顾性纳入了 778 例接受 aSAH 后手术治疗的动脉瘤患者。除了手术参数外,作者还记录了经颅多普勒(TCD)超声记录的血管痉挛(TCD-血管痉挛,血流加速>120cm/sec)、迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损(DIND)和迟发性脑梗死(DCI)。应用多变量二元逻辑回归分析评估暂时夹闭与血管痉挛、DIND 和 DCI 之间的关系。
结果 在 778 例患者中,有 338 例(43.4%)在动脉瘤手术中进行了暂时夹闭。370 例(47.6%)出现 TCD 超声血流加速,123 例(15.8%)出现 DIND,97 例(12.5%)出现 DCI。与未行暂时夹闭的患者相比,行暂时夹闭的患者 TCD 血管痉挛发生率无显著增加(分别为 49%和 48%;p=0.60)。行暂时夹闭的患者 DIND 发生率为 12%,而未行暂时夹闭的患者 DIND 发生率为 18%(p=0.01)。行暂时夹闭的患者 DCI 发生率为 9%,未行暂时夹闭的患者 DCI 发生率为 15%(p=0.02)。需要抢救性暂时夹闭是 DCI 的预测因素;在抢救性暂时夹闭组中,有 19.5%的患者发生梗死,而在选择性暂时夹闭组中,只有 11.3%的患者发生梗死(p=0.02)。选择性暂时夹闭与 TCD 血管痉挛(p=0.31)、DIND(p=0.18)或 DCI(p=0.06)无关。
结论 与未行暂时夹闭的患者相比,暂时夹闭并未导致 TCD 血管痉挛、DIND 或 DCI 发生率升高。相反,暂时夹闭与 DIND 和 DCI 发生率较低有关。如果认为合适,没有理由犹豫使用选择性暂时夹闭。