1 Unit of Co-ordinated Cancer Investigation, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
2 Palliative Education and Research Center, Linköping, Sweden.
Scand J Surg. 2018 Mar;107(1):48-53. doi: 10.1177/1457496917731192. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Endoscopic stents in the common bile duct is the first treatment choice to alleviate symptoms of biliary obstruction due to malignant disease. When endoscopic stenting fails in palliative patients, one option is to use a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, but it is not clear whether and how it can reduce the symptom load. The aim of this study was to evaluate benefits and disadvantages of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in palliative care.
Inclusion criteria were malignant disease and bilirubin ≥26 µmol/L in plasma. A structured protocol for obtaining data from the medical records was used. Data were collected from the time of last computed tomography scan before the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was placed and during 14 days afterward.
Inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 140 patients. Median age was 70 years (33-91 years). Some 126 patients had a remaining external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Jaundice was the initial symptom in 62 patients (44%). Within the first week after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, the bilirubin decreased from 237 µmol/L (31-634) to 180 µmol/L (17-545). Only 25% reached a level below the double upper reference value. Pruritus occurred in 27% before the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, but the bilirubin value did not differ from patients without pruritus. However, the pruritus was relieved in 56% with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Antibiotic prophylaxis protected to some extent from infectious complications. Adverse events were common and early mortality was high (16% within 14 days). Jaundice should not by itself be an indication for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for palliation except when the aim is to prepare the patient for chemotherapy. It is mandatory that the patients are informed carefully about what can be expected regarding the positive effects and the risks of adverse events.
内镜下胆管支架置入术是缓解恶性疾病所致胆道梗阻症状的首选治疗方法。对于姑息治疗患者,如果内镜下支架置入术失败,一种选择是行经皮经肝胆管引流术,但尚不清楚它是否以及如何减轻症状负担。本研究旨在评估经皮经肝胆管引流术在姑息治疗中的利弊。
纳入标准为恶性疾病和血浆胆红素≥26µmol/L。使用获取病历数据的结构化方案。数据收集自放置经皮经肝胆管引流术之前的最后一次计算机断层扫描扫描时间点,以及之后的 14 天。
共纳入 140 例患者,中位年龄为 70 岁(33-91 岁)。126 例患者仍有外部经皮经肝胆管引流。62 例(44%)患者以黄疸为首发症状。经皮经肝胆管引流术后第 1 周,胆红素从 237µmol/L(31-634)降至 180µmol/L(17-545)。仅有 25%的患者胆红素水平降至两倍上限以下。经皮经肝胆管引流术之前有 27%的患者出现瘙痒,但胆红素值与无瘙痒的患者无差异。然而,56%的患者瘙痒经经皮经肝胆管引流术缓解。抗生素预防在一定程度上可以预防感染并发症。不良事件常见,早期死亡率高(14 天内 16%)。除非是为化疗做准备,否则黄疸本身不应成为姑息治疗行经皮经肝胆管引流术的指征。必须仔细告知患者关于积极影响和不良事件风险的预期。