• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术中放射性粒子定位:切缘阳性率低且无学习曲线。

Radioactive seed localization for breast conservation surgery: Low positive margin rate with no learning curve.

作者信息

Velazco Cristine S, Wasif Nabil, Pockaj Barbara A, Gray Richard J

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):1091-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.025
PMID:28947271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is an alternative to wire localization. We compared the rate of positive margins for evidence of a learning curve in implementing RSL.

METHODS

A retrospective review of RSL by three surgeons at a single institution from 2002 to 2016. Positive margins were defined as ink on tumor.

RESULTS

Surgeon experience with RSL for ranged from 142 to >500 cases. The positive margin rate among the first 100 of each surgeons' experience (n = 300) was 2.3% and the rate during the most recent up to 100 cases after experience with at least 100 RSL procedures (n = 242) was 4.1% (p = 0.32). Individual surgeon's positive margin rates ranged from 2 to 5% in the early experience and 2-7% in the later experience (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

RSL for breast conservation surgery has a low rate of positive margins even early in a surgeon's experience. Implementation of RSL can be done with no evidence of a learning curve.

摘要

背景

放射性种子定位(RSL)是金属丝定位的一种替代方法。我们比较了切缘阳性率,以寻找实施RSL过程中学习曲线的证据。

方法

对一家机构的三位外科医生在2002年至2016年期间进行的RSL进行回顾性研究。切缘阳性定义为肿瘤上有墨水标记。

结果

外科医生的RSL经验范围为142至超过500例。每位外科医生最初100例手术(n = 300)中的切缘阳性率为2.3%,在至少进行100例RSL手术后的最近100例手术期间(n = 242),切缘阳性率为4.1%(p = 0.32)。个别外科医生在早期经验中的切缘阳性率为2%至5%,在后期经验中为2%至7%(p = 无统计学意义)。

结论

即使在外科医生经验早期,用于保乳手术的RSL切缘阳性率也很低。实施RSL时没有学习曲线的证据。

相似文献

1
Radioactive seed localization for breast conservation surgery: Low positive margin rate with no learning curve.保乳手术中放射性粒子定位:切缘阳性率低且无学习曲线。
Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):1091-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
2
The introduction of radioactive seed localisation improves the oncological outcome of image guided breast conservation surgery.放射性种子定位的引入提高了影像引导保乳手术的肿瘤学结果。
Breast. 2017 Dec;36:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization.术前125I放射性粒子定位乳腺病变后影响手术切缘的影像因素:与金属丝定位的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):1112-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14715. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes.乳房肿瘤切除术的放射性粒子定位与金属丝定位:结果比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):872-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12743.
5
Breast conserving surgery for extensive DCIS using multiple radioactive seeds.使用多个放射性种子对广泛导管原位癌进行保乳手术。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;44(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Radioactive seed localization compared with wire-guided localization of non-palpable breast carcinoma in breast conservation surgery- the first experience in the United Kingdom.在保乳手术中,放射性粒子定位与不可触及乳腺癌的金属丝引导定位的比较——英国的首次经验。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jan;91(1081):20170268. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170268. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
7
Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire-Guided Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: A Cost and Operating Room Efficiency Analysis.放射性粒子定位与导丝定位在不可触及乳腺癌中的应用:成本和手术室效率分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3567-3573. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6084-z. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
8
Breast localization techniques and margin definitions used by Australian and New Zealand surgeons.澳大利亚和新西兰外科医生所采用的乳房定位技术及切缘定义。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Oct;86(10):744-745. doi: 10.1111/ans.13632.
9
Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.放射性粒子定位与导丝定位在不可触及乳腺病变中的应用:一家大型社区医院的两年初步经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):131-136. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6102-1. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Clinical utility of radioactive seed localization in nonpalpable breast cancer: A retrospective single institutional cohort study.放射性粒子定位在触诊阴性乳腺癌中的临床应用:一项回顾性单机构队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:149-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in the localization techniques for non-palpable breast lesions: Make invisible visible.不可触及乳腺病变定位技术的创新:让不可见变为可见。
Breast. 2025 Jun;81:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104430. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
The Evolving Role of Radiofrequency Guided Localisation in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.射频引导定位在乳腺手术中不断演变的作用:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 5;13(19):4996. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194996.
3
Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach.
仰卧位图像引导下的乳腺癌手术入路中变形的影响。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Nov;16(11):2055-2066. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02452-8. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Reflector-Guided Localisation of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: A Prospective Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT System.反射器引导下不可触及乳腺病变的定位:SAVI SCOUT系统的前瞻性评估
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 17;13(10):2409. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102409.
5
How to Safely Perform Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Radioactive Seed Localizations in the Breast.如何在乳腺中安全地进行磁共振成像引导下的放射性种子定位
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 Apr 9;10:19. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_11_2020. eCollection 2020.
6
Wireless Breast Localization Using Radio-frequency Identification Tags: The First Reported European Experience in Breast Cancer.无线乳腺定位使用射频识别标签:欧洲首例乳腺癌报道。
In Vivo. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):233-238. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11765.
7
Histological changes secondary to wire coil placement in breast tissue and lymph nodes.乳腺组织和淋巴结中线圈放置引起的组织学变化。
Virchows Arch. 2018 Sep;473(3):285-291. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2399-9. Epub 2018 Jul 8.