Suppr超能文献

自我报告数据与卫生行政数据:对评估人群慢性病负担的影响。一项横断面研究。

Self-reported versus health administrative data: implications for assessing chronic illness burden in populations. A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Fortin Martin, Haggerty Jeannie, Sanche Steven, Almirall José

机构信息

Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin, Almirall), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Medicine (Haggerty), McGill University; St. Mary's Research Centre (Sanche), St. Mary's Hospital, Montréal, Que.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;5(3):E729-E733. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170029.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various data sources may be used to document the presence of chronic medical conditions. This study examined the agreement between self-reported and health administrative data.

METHODS

A randomly selected cohort of participants aged 25-75 years recruited by telephone from the general population of Quebec reported on the presence of 1 or more chronic conditions from a candidate list of 12 conditions: diabetes, hypertension, thyroid disorder, any cardiac disease, cancer diagnosis in the previous 5 years (including melanoma but excluding other skin cancers), asthma, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or lupus, osteoporosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intestinal disease and hypercholesterolemia. We also used health administrative data from Quebec's universal health insurance provider to identify participants' chronic conditions. Unique identifiers allowed linkage of both data sources to the individual participant. The frequencies of the 12 conditions and the prevalence of multimorbidity (≥ 2, ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 conditions) were analyzed for each data source.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 1177 participants (mean age 53 [standard deviation 12.4] yr; 684 women [58.1%]). We found low (but varied) agreement between the 2 data sources, with the poorest agreement for hypercholesterolemia (κ = 0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.07]) and the best for diabetes (κ = 0.82 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.88]). Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity obtained with health administrative data were lower than those obtained with self-reported data regardless of the operational definition used. Most participants with multimorbidity were identified by self-report.

INTERPRETATION

We argue for the use of self-reported chronic conditions in the study of multimorbidity, as health administrative data based on the billing system in Quebec seem to underestimate the prevalence of many chronic conditions, which results in biased estimates of multimorbidity.

摘要

背景

可使用各种数据源来记录慢性疾病的存在情况。本研究考察了自我报告数据与卫生行政数据之间的一致性。

方法

通过电话从魁北克普通人群中随机选取了一组年龄在25至75岁之间的参与者,他们需报告12种疾病候选清单中1种或更多慢性疾病的存在情况,这些疾病包括:糖尿病、高血压、甲状腺疾病、任何心脏病、过去5年内的癌症诊断(包括黑色素瘤但不包括其他皮肤癌)、哮喘、骨关节炎、类风湿关节炎或狼疮、骨质疏松症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肠道疾病和高胆固醇血症。我们还使用了魁北克全民健康保险提供商的卫生行政数据来确定参与者的慢性疾病。唯一标识符允许将两个数据源与个体参与者进行关联。对每个数据源分析了12种疾病的频率以及多重疾病(≥2种、≥3种和≥4种疾病)的患病率。

结果

我们分析了1177名参与者的数据(平均年龄53岁[标准差12.4];684名女性[58.1%])。我们发现两个数据源之间的一致性较低(但有所不同),高胆固醇血症的一致性最差(κ = 0.04[95%置信区间(CI) 0.01至0.07]),糖尿病的一致性最好(κ = 0.82[95%CI 0.76至0.88])。无论使用何种操作定义,通过卫生行政数据获得的多重疾病患病率估计值均低于通过自我报告数据获得的估计值。大多数患有多重疾病的参与者是通过自我报告识别出来的。

解读

我们主张在多重疾病研究中使用自我报告的慢性疾病情况,因为基于魁北克计费系统的卫生行政数据似乎低估了许多慢性疾病的患病率,这导致对多重疾病的估计存在偏差。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验