Suppr超能文献

基于数字乳腺断层合成图像的乳腺肿块三维分割

Three-dimensional segmentation of breast masses from digital breast tomosynthesis images.

作者信息

Pöhlmann Stefanie T L, Lim Yit Y, Harkness Elaine, Pritchard Susan, Taylor Christopher J, Astley Susan M

机构信息

University of Manchester, Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, United Kingdom.

University Hospital of South Manchester, Nightingale Breast Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):034007. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034007. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

Abstract

Assessment of three-dimensional (3-D) morphology and volume of breast masses is important for cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment but cannot be derived from conventional mammography. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) provides data from which 3-D mass segmentation could be obtained. Our method combined Gaussian mixture models based on intensity and a texture measure indicative of in-focus structure, gray-level variance. Thresholding these voxel probabilities, weighted by distance to the estimated mass center, gave the final 3-D segmentation. Evaluation used 40 masses annotated twice by a consultant radiologist on in-focus slices in two diagnostic views. Human intraobserver variability was assessed as the overlap between repeated annotations (median 77% and range 25% to 91%). Comparing the segmented mass outline with probability-weighted ground truth from these annotations, median agreement was 68%, and range was 7% to 88%. Annotated and segmented diameters correlated well with histological mass size (both Spearman's rank correlations [Formula: see text]). The volumetric segmentation demonstrated better agreement with tumor volumes estimated from pathology than volume derived from radiological annotations (95% limits of agreement [Formula: see text] to 11 ml and [Formula: see text] to 41 ml, respectively). We conclude that it is feasible to assess 3-D mass morphology and volume from DBT, and the method has the potential to aid breast cancer management.

摘要

评估乳腺肿块的三维(3-D)形态和体积对于癌症诊断、分期及治疗很重要,但传统乳腺X线摄影无法提供这些信息。数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)可提供能用于获取三维肿块分割的数据。我们的方法结合了基于强度的高斯混合模型和一种指示聚焦结构的纹理测量方法——灰度方差。通过对这些体素概率进行阈值处理,并根据到估计肿块中心的距离加权,得到最终的三维分割结果。评估使用了40个肿块,由一位放射科会诊医生在两个诊断视图的聚焦切片上进行了两次标注。观察者自身的变异性通过重复标注之间的重叠率来评估(中位数为77%,范围为25%至91%)。将分割出的肿块轮廓与这些标注中概率加权的真实情况进行比较,中位数一致性为68%,范围为7%至88%。标注的和分割出的直径与组织学肿块大小相关性良好(均为Spearman等级相关性[公式:见原文])。体积分割显示,与根据病理学估计的肿瘤体积相比,其与放射学标注得出的体积一致性更好(一致性界限分别为[公式:见原文]至11毫升和[公式:见原文]至41毫升)。我们得出结论,从DBT评估三维肿块形态和体积是可行的,该方法有潜力辅助乳腺癌管理。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional segmentation of breast masses from digital breast tomosynthesis images.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):034007. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034007. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
4
Models of breast lesions based on three-dimensional X-ray breast images.
Phys Med. 2019 Jan;57:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Lesion Segmentation in Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound: Volumetric Analysis.
Ultrason Imaging. 2018 Mar;40(2):97-112. doi: 10.1177/0161734617737733. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Breast tomosynthesis: What do we know and where do we stand?
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Oct;100(10):537-551. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Re-excision Rates and Local Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Therapy.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012 Nov;72(11):1018-1023. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327980.
3
Deep feature learning for knee cartilage segmentation using a triplanar convolutional neural network.
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(Pt 2):246-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_31.
4
Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach.
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Jun;49:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi7-23. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt284. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
6
Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography.
Clin Radiol. 2013 Dec;68(12):1254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 21;57(22):7629-50. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7629. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验