Silva Ivair R
Department of Statistics, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Morro do Cruzeiro, CEP 35400 000 Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Stat Med. 2018 Jan 15;37(1):107-118. doi: 10.1002/sim.7504. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Type I error probability spending functions are commonly used for designing sequential analysis of binomial data in clinical trials, but it is also quickly emerging for near-continuous sequential analysis of post-market drug and vaccine safety surveillance. It is well known that, for clinical trials, when the null hypothesis is not rejected, it is still important to minimize the sample size. Unlike in post-market drug and vaccine safety surveillance, that is not important. In post-market safety surveillance, specially when the surveillance involves identification of potential signals, the meaningful statistical performance measure to be minimized is the expected sample size when the null hypothesis is rejected. The present paper shows that, instead of the convex Type I error spending shape conventionally used in clinical trials, a concave shape is more indicated for post-market drug and vaccine safety surveillance. This is shown for both, continuous and group sequential analysis.
I型错误概率消耗函数通常用于设计临床试验中二元数据的序贯分析,但它也迅速出现在上市后药品和疫苗安全性监测的近连续序贯分析中。众所周知,对于临床试验,当原假设未被拒绝时,最小化样本量仍然很重要。与上市后药品和疫苗安全性监测不同,这一点并不重要。在上市后安全性监测中,特别是当监测涉及潜在信号的识别时,要最小化的有意义的统计性能指标是原假设被拒绝时的预期样本量。本文表明,对于上市后药品和疫苗安全性监测,与临床试验中传统使用的凸形I型错误消耗形状不同,凹形更适用。连续分析和组序贯分析均表明了这一点。