Deters Maira Anna, Laven Anna, Castejon Ana, Doucette William R, Ev Lisiane Slveira, Krass Ines, Mehuys Els, Obarcanin Emina, Schwender Holger, Laeer Stephanie
1 Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
2 Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Feb;52(2):198-211. doi: 10.1177/1060028017733272. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
To evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included interventions provided by community pharmacists for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, the analysis of each component of the intervention(s), and the description of the training that the pharmacists received.
The literature research was conducted in PubMed and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2000 to April 2016) for RCTs with interventions provided by community pharmacists for patients with diabetes. Corresponding authors were contacted about missing data and intervention and training design.
RCTs published in English or German were included if pharmaceutical care or medication therapy management was conducted by community pharmacists with diabetes patients. Basic information, intervention and training design data were extracted.
The literature research resulted in 11 eligible studies for further analysis. The corresponding authors of 6 studies responded to our request and sent their raw data. The calculated meta-analytical effect of 640 analyzed patients was a hemoglobin A (A1C) difference of -0.66%, with a 95% CI of -0.86% to -0.45%. The analysis revealed that most intervention elements had a significant positive meta-analytical effect on the A1C values.
Our meta-analysis suggests that community pharmacist-led interventions can improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes. The most effective intervention components were patient centered and interdisciplinary. Pharmaceutical care interventions should, therefore, include the following components: sending feedback to the physician, setting individual goals, reviewing medication, and assessing patients' health beliefs and medication knowledge.
评估随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验包括社区药剂师为1型和2型糖尿病患者提供的干预措施、对干预措施各组成部分的分析,以及药剂师所接受培训的描述。
在PubMed和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2000年1月至2016年4月)中进行文献研究,以查找社区药剂师为糖尿病患者提供干预措施的随机对照试验。就缺失数据以及干预和培训设计方面与相应作者进行了联系。
如果社区药剂师对糖尿病患者进行了药学服务或药物治疗管理,则纳入以英文或德文发表的随机对照试验。提取了基本信息、干预和培训设计数据。
文献研究产生了11项符合进一步分析条件的研究。6项研究的相应作者回复了我们的请求并发送了原始数据。对640名分析患者计算得出的荟萃分析效应是糖化血红蛋白(A1C)差异为-0.66%,95%置信区间为-0.86%至-0.45%。分析表明,大多数干预要素对A1C值具有显著的正向荟萃分析效应。
我们的荟萃分析表明,由社区药剂师主导的干预措施可改善1型和2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。最有效的干预组成部分是以患者为中心且跨学科的。因此,药学服务干预应包括以下组成部分:向医生反馈、设定个人目标、审查用药,以及评估患者的健康信念和用药知识。