Suppr超能文献

评价单份拭子与混合拭子培养在检测 MRSA 定植中的作用。

Evaluation of single vs pooled swab cultures for detecting MRSA colonization.

机构信息

National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Maribor, Slovenia.

National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2018 Feb;98(2):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The costs and laboratory workload arising from meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening could be reduced markedly by processing nose, throat and skin swabs from one person in a single culture broth (specimen pooling). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivities and times for MRSA detection using a variety of approaches to processing of individual and pooled swabs.

METHODS

Four hundred and seventeen swabs from 139 subjects with a history of MRSA colonization (three swabs per subject - nose, throat and skin) were submitted. Swabs were suspended in 200-μL sterile saline, and these suspensions were used individually and as pooled samples to inoculate two different chromogenic media [MRSA SMART (bioMėrieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, Paris, France) and CHROMagar MRSA (CHROMagar, Paris, France)] and Todd-Hewitt Broth; the latter cultures were then subcultured on to the same chromogenic media.

RESULTS

MRSA was detected from at least one specimen in 75 subjects (50.4%). The diagnostic sensitivities of pooled surveillance cultures compared with single cultures were 97% and 93% for direct and enrichment cultures, respectively. Enrichment culture of either individual or pooled samples had no benefit compared with direct culture (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pooling of MRSA screening swabs for either direct culture on chromogenic agar or enrichment culture is suitable for routine use.

摘要

背景

通过将来自一个人的鼻腔、咽喉和皮肤拭子置于单个培养肉汤中(标本混合)进行处理,可以显著降低耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查的成本和实验室工作量。本研究的目的是评估使用各种方法处理单个和混合拭子时检测 MRSA 的敏感性和时间。

方法

共提交了 139 名有 MRSA 定植史的受试者的 417 份拭子(每个受试者三个拭子 - 鼻腔、咽喉和皮肤)。拭子悬浮于 200μL 无菌盐水中,单独使用这些悬浮液和混合样本接种两种不同的显色培养基[MRSA SMART(bioMerieux,Marcy-l'Étoile,巴黎,法国)和 CHROMagar MRSA(CHROMagar,巴黎,法国)]和 Todd-Hewitt 肉汤;随后将这些培养物接种到相同的显色培养基上进行传代培养。

结果

至少从 75 名受试者的至少一个标本中检测到了 MRSA(50.4%)。与单个培养物相比,混合监测培养物的直接和富集培养物的诊断敏感性分别为 97%和 93%。与直接培养相比,富集培养单个或混合样本均无益处(P>0.05)。

结论

对于直接在显色琼脂上进行的培养或富集培养,混合 MRSA 筛查拭子适合常规使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验