Stevenson R C, Blackman S C, Williams C L, Bartzokas C A
Department of Economics, Liverpool University, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 1988 Jan;11(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90035-7.
An analytical framework is suggested for the economic evaluation of policies to improve the management of hospital infection. Consideration of the costs and benefits to be expected from improved policies implies the existence of an optimal infection rate which is higher than the minimum attainable. It follows that hospitals can and probably do spend too much on infection control in, at least, some areas. This optimal approach is not operational at present but its data requirements might be thought of as an agenda for future research. In the meantime, progress in infection control economics depends on a piecemeal approach. An example is given in the estimation of the cost savings attributable to an improved antibiotic prescribing policy at the Royal Liverpool Hospital.
本文提出了一个分析框架,用于对改善医院感染管理的政策进行经济评估。对改进政策所预期的成本和收益进行考量,意味着存在一个高于可达到的最低感染率的最优感染率。由此可见,医院至少在某些领域可能在感染控制方面花费过多。这种最优方法目前还无法实施,但其数据要求可被视为未来研究的议程。与此同时,感染控制经济学的进展依赖于一种渐进的方法。文中给出了一个例子,即对皇家利物浦医院改进抗生素处方政策所带来的成本节约进行估算。