From the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China (JF, YL, YY, YQ); Province Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China (JF, YL, YY, YQ); Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (SL); and Athinoula A. Martions Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (SL).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;97(4):261-269. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000834.
Unilateral neglect (UN) is a common debilitating consequence of stroke. This review focused on the effect of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques in the recovery of UN in poststroke patients.
Relevant databases were comprehensively searched, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, the Web of Knowledge, and relevant websites. All randomized controlled trials were identified which used NIBS for poststroke UN. The methodological quality and risk of bias were systematically evaluated.
Twelve studies were included, and 11 randomized controlled trials were made further meta-analysis. Participants who were randomized to active transcranial direct current stimulation (effect size [ES], -0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.02 to -0.01; P = 0.04) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (ES, -1.76; 95% CI, -2.40 to -1.12; P < 0.00001) decreased UN severity after intervention compared with the control group. Nonsignificant pooled effect size presented for continuous theta burst stimulation results (ES, -0.77; 95% CI, -1.90 to 0.37; P = 0.18). No participants experienced serious adverse events.
This review found evidence for the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the remediation of poststroke UN, but the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation was uncertain. Large-sample randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to understand effects of NIBS on poststroke UN.
单侧忽略(UN)是中风后常见的使人虚弱的后果。本综述重点关注非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术对中风后 UN 恢复的影响。
全面搜索了相关数据库,包括 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Medline、Embase、Web of Knowledge 和相关网站。确定了所有使用 NIBS 治疗中风后 UN 的随机对照试验。系统评估了方法学质量和偏倚风险。
共纳入 12 项研究,其中 11 项随机对照试验进行了进一步的荟萃分析。与对照组相比,随机分配到经颅直流电刺激(效应量[ES],-0.51;95%置信区间[CI],-1.02 至 -0.01;P=0.04)和重复经颅磁刺激(ES,-1.76;95%CI,-2.40 至-1.12;P<0.00001)的参与者在干预后 UN 严重程度降低。连续 theta 爆发刺激结果的汇总效应量无显著差异(ES,-0.77;95%CI,-1.90 至 0.37;P=0.18)。没有参与者出现严重不良事件。
本综述发现了重复经颅磁刺激治疗中风后 UN 的疗效证据,但经颅直流电刺激和连续 theta 爆发刺激的疗效尚不确定。需要进行大样本随机对照临床试验,以了解 NIBS 对中风后 UN 的影响。