Brain Damage Unit, Beata María Ana Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
J Neurol. 2022 Dec;269(12):6310-6329. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11338-x. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
Hemispatial neglect is one of the most frequent attention disorders after stroke. The presence of neglect is associated with longer hospital stays, extended rehabilitation periods, and poorer functional recovery. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new technique with promising results in neglect rehabilitation; therefore, the objective of this systematic review, performed following the PRISMA guidelines, is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on neglect recovery after stroke. The search was done in MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and BioMed Central databases. A total of 311 articles were found; only 11 met the inclusion criteria, including 152 post-stroke patients in total. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed for all the studies, and methodological characteristics of the studies, sample sizes, methods, main results, and other relevant data were extracted. tDCS intervention ranged from one to twenty sessions distributed in 1 day to 4 weeks, with intensity ranged from 1 to 2 mA. We found moderate evidence for the efficacy of tDCS in the rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after a stroke, being more effective in combination with other interventions. Nonetheless, the limited number of studies and some studies' design characteristics makes it risky to draw categorical conclusions. Since scientific evidence is still scarce, further research is needed to determine the advantage of this treatment in acute, sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. Future studies should include larger samples, longer follow-ups, and broader neurophysiological assessments, with the final aim of establishing the appropriate use of tDCS as an adjuvant intervention in neurorehabilitation settings.
偏侧空间忽略是中风后最常见的注意力障碍之一。忽略的存在与住院时间延长、康复期延长和功能恢复较差有关。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种在忽略康复中具有前景的新技术;因此,本系统评价按照 PRISMA 指南进行,目的是评估 tDCS 对中风后忽略恢复的效果。检索了 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library 和 BioMed Central 数据库。共发现 311 篇文章,只有 11 篇符合纳入标准,总共包括 152 例中风后患者。对所有研究进行了方法学质量和偏倚风险评估,并提取了研究的方法学特征、样本量、方法、主要结果和其他相关数据。tDCS 干预范围从 1 次到 20 次,每天 1 次到 4 周 1 次,强度范围从 1 mA 到 2 mA。我们发现 tDCS 对中风后偏侧空间忽略康复的疗效有中等证据,与其他干预措施联合使用时效果更好。尽管研究数量有限,并且一些研究的设计特征存在风险,但仍难以得出结论。由于科学证据仍然匮乏,需要进一步研究以确定这种治疗方法在急性、亚急性和慢性中风患者中的优势。未来的研究应包括更大的样本量、更长的随访时间和更广泛的神经生理学评估,最终目的是确定 tDCS 在神经康复环境中作为辅助干预的适当用途。