Calderwood Camille S, Thurmond Amy, Holland Amanda, Osmundsen Blake, Gregory W Thomas
Women's Imaging & Intervention, Lake Oswego.
Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center, Portland, OR.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):295-300. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000485.
The aim of this study was to compare the detection of levator ani defects (LAD) between 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) and 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
This is a secondary analysis of the Pelvic Floor Nerve Injury Following Childbirth Study. Nulliparous women underwent a standardized protocol of pelvic floor evaluations between January 2008 and December 2013, prior to pregnancy (V1) and at 2 points postpartum: 6 weeks (V2) and 6 months (V3). Those women who underwent a high-resolution 3D MRI pelvic floor sequence were selected. Comparisons were made to concomitantly acquired 3D perineal US. Eight tomographic slices were examined in the axial plane, each side independently scored with 0 (no defect) or 1 (defect). A similar tomographic approach was applied to the MRI. For both MRI and US, the right and left sides were each scored. A total score of 0 to 8 was given to each side. A dichotomous variable "complete LAD" was defined. Cohen κ was used as a measurement of agreement of complete LAD between MRI and US. Kendall τ b was used to correlate total scores.
On the right side, 80 (90%) of 89 pairs were in agreement (concordant in the diagnosis or not of a "defect"). On the left side, 72 (81%) of 89 pairs were in agreement. Correlations (Cohen κ) of complete LAD were 0.65 (P < 0.001) on the right and 0.37 (P < 0.001) on the left. Correlations of total scores were 0.47 (P < 0.001) on the right and 0.41 (P < 0.001) on the left.
Moderate agreement was found between 3D US and 3D MRI LAD detection. More LADs and discordance were seen on the left.
本研究旨在比较三维(3D)超声(US)和三维磁共振成像(MRI)对肛提肌缺陷(LAD)的检测情况。
这是一项对产后盆底神经损伤研究的二次分析。未生育女性在2008年1月至2013年12月期间,于怀孕前(V1)以及产后两个时间点:产后6周(V2)和产后6个月(V3),接受了标准化的盆底评估方案。选取了那些接受过高分辨率3D MRI盆底序列检查的女性。将其与同时获取的3D会阴超声进行比较。在轴平面上检查8个断层切片,每侧独立评分,0分表示无缺陷,1分表示有缺陷。对MRI采用类似的断层扫描方法。对于MRI和超声,分别对左右两侧进行评分。每侧的总分范围为0至8分。定义了一个二分变量“完全LAD”。采用Cohen κ系数来衡量MRI和超声在完全LAD方面的一致性。使用Kendall τ b系数来关联总分。
在右侧,89对中有80对(90%)结果一致(在缺陷诊断方面一致或不一致)。在左侧,89对中有72对(81%)结果一致。右侧完全LAD的相关性(Cohen κ系数)为0.65(P < 0.001),左侧为0.37(P < 0.001)。右侧总分的相关性为0.47(P < 0.001),左侧为0.41(P < 0.001)。
3D超声和3D MRI在LAD检测方面存在中度一致性。左侧发现更多的LAD且不一致情况更多。