• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惊恐障碍中的决策制定。初步报告。

Decision-making in panic disorder. Preliminary report.

作者信息

Jakuszkowiak-Wojten Katarzyna, Raczak Alicja, Landowski Jerzy, Wiglusz Mariusz Stanisław, Gałuszko-Węgielnik Maria, Krysta Krzysztof, Cubała Wiesław Jerzy

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki St. 7 build. 25, 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland,

出版信息

Psychiatr Danub. 2017 Sep;29(Suppl 3):353-356.

PMID:28953790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impaired decision-making with high risk-aversive behavior and elevated impulsivity are reported as a trait feature in anxiety disorders including panic disorder (PD). It is hypothesised that PD patients exhibit difficulties in executive functions which can influence patients behavioural strategies e.g. problem solving, decision making, planning, impulse control. The aim of this study was to asses decision making process, risk-taking and impulsivity in PD patients as compared to healthy controls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-one psychotropic drug-naive PD outpatients and 20 healthy subjects matched by age and sex were examined. Cognitive decision-making and risk-taking behaviour was measured with CGT (Cambridge Gambling Task) from CANTAB battery. The PD severity was assessed with Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS). The level of anxiety and depression was assessed with HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Impulsivity was evaluated with the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11 version (BIS-11).

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences on CGT in PD patients as compared to healthy control. However, having observed more closely, there are some differences between patients and healthy control. PD patients with higher anxiety level in HADS exhibited lower percentages of risky decisions comparing to PD with lower anxiety in HADS. PD patients with higher depression level in HADS demonstrated slowed decision-making when compared to PD patients with low level of depression in HADS. Total impulsivity and its attentional and motor dimensions were significantly higher in panic disorder patients versus healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences with regard to CGT assessed decision-making between drug-naive PD patients and healthy controls. The PD patients with higher HADS-D depression level demonstrated slowed decision-making as compared to PD patients with low level of depression.

摘要

背景

据报道,包括惊恐障碍(PD)在内的焦虑症患者存在决策受损、高风险规避行为和冲动性增加等特质特征。据推测,PD患者在执行功能方面存在困难,这可能会影响患者的行为策略,如解决问题、决策、规划和冲动控制。本研究的目的是评估PD患者与健康对照者的决策过程、冒险行为和冲动性。

材料与方法

对21名未服用过精神药物的PD门诊患者和20名年龄和性别匹配的健康受试者进行了检查。使用剑桥神经心理测试自动化成套系统(CANTAB)中的剑桥赌博任务(CGT)测量认知决策和冒险行为。用惊恐和广场恐怖症量表(PAS)评估PD的严重程度。用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估焦虑和抑郁水平。用Barratt冲动性量表第11版(BIS-11)评估冲动性。

结果

与健康对照相比,PD患者在CGT上无统计学显著差异。然而,经过更仔细的观察,患者与健康对照之间存在一些差异。与HADS焦虑水平较低的PD患者相比,HADS焦虑水平较高的PD患者做出冒险决策的百分比更低。与HADS抑郁水平较低的PD患者相比,HADS抑郁水平较高的PD患者决策速度较慢。惊恐障碍患者的总冲动性及其注意力和运动维度显著高于健康对照。

结论

未服用过药物的PD患者与健康对照在CGT评估的决策方面无统计学显著差异。与抑郁水平较低的PD患者相比,HADS-D抑郁水平较高的PD患者决策速度较慢。

相似文献

1
Decision-making in panic disorder. Preliminary report.惊恐障碍中的决策制定。初步报告。
Psychiatr Danub. 2017 Sep;29(Suppl 3):353-356.
2
Cognitive correlates in panic disorder as related to impulsivity - preliminary report.惊恐障碍与冲动性相关的认知相关性——初步报告。
Psychiatr Danub. 2012 Sep;24 Suppl 1:S41-3.
3
Impulsivity in panic disorder: neuropsychological correlates.惊恐障碍中的冲动性:神经心理学相关性。
Psychiatr Danub. 2013 Sep;25 Suppl 2:S149-52.
4
Impulsivity and Panic Disorder: an exploratory study of psychometric correlates.冲动性与惊恐障碍:心理测量学相关性的探索性研究
Psychiatr Danub. 2015 Sep;27 Suppl 1:S456-8.
5
The relationship between impulsivity and panic disorder-agoraphobia: The role of affective temperament.冲动性与惊恐障碍-广场恐惧症的关系:情感气质的作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jun;264:169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Impulsivity in patients with panic disorder-agoraphobia: the role of cyclothymia.惊恐障碍-广场恐怖症患者的冲动性:环性心境障碍的作用。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;54(7):1090-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
Differential performance on tasks of affective processing and decision-making in patients with Panic Disorder and Panic Disorder with comorbid Major Depressive Disorder.惊恐障碍患者以及伴有共病重度抑郁症的惊恐障碍患者在情感加工和决策任务上的差异表现。
J Affect Disord. 2006 Oct;95(1-3):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
8
Reflection impulsivity in patients with panic disorder.惊恐障碍患者的反射性冲动。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2025 Mar;38(2):234-246. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2393207. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
9
Think twice: Impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder.三思而后行:强迫症中的冲动性与决策制定
J Behav Addict. 2015 Dec;4(4):263-72. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.039.
10
Correlation between impulsivity and executive function in patients with Parkinson disease experiencing depression and anxiety symptoms.帕金森病伴发抑郁和焦虑症状患者冲动性与执行功能之间的相关性
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2015 Mar;28(1):49-56. doi: 10.1177/0891988714541870. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Altered Low Frequency Heart Rate Variability Associated with Agoraphobia in Panic Disorder: A Retrospective Study.惊恐障碍伴广场恐怖症患者低频心率变异性的改变:一项回顾性研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2023 Nov;64(11):670-678. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.0592.
2
The influence of fear on risk taking: a meta-analysis.恐惧对冒险行为的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1143-1159. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1731428. Epub 2020 Mar 2.