Suppr超能文献

移动健康干预措施对改善儿童约束系统安装是否有价值?一项针对家长的混合方法研究。

Are mHealth Interventions to Improve Child Restraint System Installation of Value? A Mixed Methods Study of Parents.

作者信息

Fleisher Linda, Erkoboni Danielle, Halkyard Katherine, Sykes Emily, Norris Marisol S, Walker Lorrie, Winston Flaura

机构信息

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

National Clinician Scholars, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 26;14(10):1122. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101122.

Abstract

Childhood death from vehicle crashes and the delivery of information about proper child restraint systems (CRS) use continues to be a critical public health issue. Safe Seat, a sequential, mixed-methods study identified gaps in parental knowledge about and perceived challenges in the use of appropriate CRS and insights into the preferences of various technological approaches to deliver CRS education. Focus groups (eight groups with 21 participants) and a quantitative national survey (N = 1251) using MTurk were conducted. Although there were differences in the age, racial/ethnic background, and educational level between the focus group participants and the national sample, there was a great deal of consistency in the need for more timely and personalized information about CRS. The majority of parents did not utilize car seat check professionals although they expressed interest in and lack of knowledge about how to access these resources. Although there was some interest in an app that would be personalized and able to push just-in-time content (e.g., new guidelines, location and times of car seat checks), content that has sporadic relevance (e.g., initial installation) seemed more appropriate for a website. Stakeholder input is critical to guide the development and delivery of acceptable and useful child safety education.

摘要

儿童因车祸死亡以及提供有关正确使用儿童约束系统(CRS)的信息仍然是一个关键的公共卫生问题。“安全座椅”是一项采用序贯混合方法的研究,该研究发现了父母在正确使用CRS方面的知识差距和认知挑战,并深入了解了提供CRS教育的各种技术方法的偏好。研究开展了焦点小组(8个小组,共21名参与者)以及使用亚马逊土耳其机器人平台进行的全国性定量调查(N = 1251)。尽管焦点小组参与者与全国样本在年龄、种族/族裔背景和教育水平上存在差异,但在获取更及时、个性化的CRS信息方面需求具有很大的一致性。大多数家长虽然对如何获取汽车座椅检查专业人员的资源感兴趣且缺乏相关知识,但并未利用这些专业人员。尽管家长们对一款能够个性化推送即时内容(如新指南、汽车座椅检查地点和时间)的应用程序有一定兴趣,但对于偶尔相关的内容(如初次安装),网站似乎更为合适。利益相关者的投入对于指导可接受且有用的儿童安全教育的开发和提供至关重要。

相似文献

4
Systematic review of child restraint system interventions (2007-2018).系统回顾儿童约束系统干预措施(2007-2018 年)。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(8):866-872. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1666372. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验