Suppr超能文献

针对家长的儿童约束系统使用干预措施效果评估:一项系统综述与荟萃分析

Assessment of the effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions for the use of child restraint systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sun Ya-Ru, Liu Ting, Ran Ni, Chen Jun-Yu, Niu Yu-Shuo, Wang Xin, Luo Ying, Lu Ming-Qin, Yang Xiu-Ling

机构信息

Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Child Prevention and Health Care, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Transl Pediatr. 2022 Dec;11(12):1939-1948. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-560.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is essential to implement parent-targeted interventions to increase the use of child restraint systems (CRS) and thus reduce the injuries and deaths of children due to motor vehicle collisions. To optimize future intervention designs, this meta-analysis sought to quantify the effects of parent-targeted interventions and explore potential intervention moderators.

METHODS

Studies met inclusion criteria if they included a parents-targeted intervention that focused on increasing CRS use for children, published from the inception of the databases to January 2022, were systematically retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Sinomed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. Next, 2 researchers independently screened the retrieved articles, evaluated their quality according to the Cochrane Tool, and extracted the data. Finally, Stata12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was examined with I, stratified analyses, and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1,690 articles retrieved, 9 studies, comprising 22,329 parents of children aged 0-12 years, were ultimately included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CRS use rate of the intervention group was 1.62 times higher than that of the control group [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-2.11, Z=3.616, P<0.001], indicating the positive effect of parent-targeted interventions on promoting the use of CRS. The subgroup analysis found that interventions guided by behavioral theories increased the use of CRS (odds ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.27-1.63, n=5). The difference in the use of CRS between the groups in the studies that were not guided by theories was not statistically significant, indicating that interventions guided by behavioral theories may be the source of the heterogeneity. Risk of bias was low in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to conduct interventions with parents to increase the use of CRS. The effects on CRS use appear to differ depending on whether the interventions are guided by behavioral theories. In-depth research needs to be conducted to explore the characteristics of the interventions, especially those guided by different behavioral theories, to reduce child vehicle injuries.

摘要

背景

实施针对父母的干预措施以增加儿童约束系统(CRS)的使用,从而减少因机动车碰撞导致的儿童伤亡至关重要。为了优化未来的干预设计,本荟萃分析旨在量化针对父母的干预措施的效果,并探索潜在的干预调节因素。

方法

如果研究包括一项以父母为目标的干预措施,该措施侧重于增加儿童CRS的使用,且从数据库建立之初至2022年1月发表,则纳入标准。从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方和知网数据库中系统检索相关研究。接下来,两名研究人员独立筛选检索到的文章,根据Cochrane工具评估其质量,并提取数据。最后,使用Stata12.0进行荟萃分析。采用I²、分层分析和meta回归检验异质性。

结果

在检索到的1690篇文章中,最终纳入9项研究,共涉及22329名0至12岁儿童的父母。荟萃分析结果显示,干预组的CRS使用率比对照组高1.62倍[95%置信区间(CI):1.25 - 2.11,Z = 3.616,P < 0.001],表明针对父母的干预措施对促进CRS使用具有积极效果。亚组分析发现,以行为理论为指导的干预措施增加了CRS的使用(优势比:1.44,95%CI:1.27 - 1.63,n = 5)。在未以理论为指导的研究中,各组之间CRS使用的差异无统计学意义,这表明以行为理论为指导的干预措施可能是异质性的来源。大多数研究的偏倚风险较低。

结论

有必要对父母进行干预以增加CRS的使用。对CRS使用的影响似乎因干预措施是否以行为理论为指导而有所不同。需要进行深入研究以探索干预措施的特点,尤其是那些以不同行为理论为指导的措施,以减少儿童机动车伤害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验