Weynants Laurens, Hervé François, Decalf Veerle, Kumps Candy, Pieters Ronny, Troyer Bart de, Everaert Karel
Urology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
AZ Nikolaas, Hooggstraat 177, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Int Neurourol J. 2017 Sep;21(3):189-196. doi: 10.5213/inj.1734824.412. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is now considered the gold standard for the management of urinary retention. In the literature, several articles on patients' perspectives on CISC and adherence to this technique have been published. No studies have yet explored the points of view of professional caregivers, such as nurses and doctors. The aim of this study was to explore the opinions of urologists about CISC and to evaluate the need for dedicated nurses specialized in CISC through a self-administered questionnaire.
A questionnaire was developed to explore the opinions of professional caregivers about self-catheterization and to evaluate the need to provide nurses with specialized education in CISC. Questionnaires were sent to 244 urologists through email. We received 101 completed questionnaires. The response rate was 41.4%.
Hand function, the presence or absence of tremor, and visual acuity were rated as the most important determinants for proposing CISC to a patient. Twenty-five percent of the urologists reported that financial remuneration would give them a greater incentive to propose CISC. The lack of dedicated nurses was reported by half of the urologists as a factor preventing them from proposing CISC. A meaningful number of urologists thought that patients perceive CISC as invasive and unpleasant. Although most urologists would choose CISC as a treatment option for themselves, almost 1 urologist out of 5 would prefer a permanent catheter.
This questionnaire gave valuable insights into urologists' perceptions of CISC, and could serve as the basis for a subsequent broader international study. Further research should also focus on the opinions of nurses and other caregivers involved in incontinence management. Apart from financial remuneration, it is also clear that ensuring sufficient expertise and time for high-quality CISC care is important. This could be a potential role for dedicated nurses.
清洁间歇性自我导尿(CISC)现被视为尿潴留管理的金标准。在文献中,已发表了多篇关于患者对CISC的看法及对该技术依从性的文章。然而,尚无研究探讨护士和医生等专业护理人员的观点。本研究旨在通过一份自填式问卷,探究泌尿科医生对CISC的看法,并评估对专门从事CISC的护士的需求。
设计了一份问卷,以探究专业护理人员对自我导尿的看法,并评估为护士提供CISC专业教育的必要性。通过电子邮件向244名泌尿科医生发送了问卷。我们共收到101份完整问卷。回复率为41.4%。
手部功能、是否存在震颤以及视力被评为向患者推荐CISC时最重要的决定因素。25%的泌尿科医生表示,经济报酬会促使他们更积极地推荐CISC。一半的泌尿科医生称,缺乏专门的护士是阻碍他们推荐CISC的一个因素。相当数量的泌尿科医生认为,患者将CISC视为侵入性且不愉快的操作。尽管大多数泌尿科医生会选择CISC作为自己的治疗方案,但每5名泌尿科医生中就有近1人更倾向于使用永久性导尿管。
这份问卷为泌尿科医生对CISC的看法提供了有价值的见解,并可为后续更广泛的国际研究奠定基础。进一步的研究还应关注参与尿失禁管理的护士和其他护理人员的观点。除了经济报酬外,确保有足够的专业知识和时间来提供高质量的CISC护理也很重要。这可能是专门护士的一个潜在作用。