Couch Daniel G, Tasker Chris, Theophilidou Elena, Lund Jonathan N, O'Sullivan Saoirse E
School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, U.K.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2017 Oct 25;131(21):2611-2626. doi: 10.1042/CS20171288. Print 2017 Nov 1.
We sought to quantify the anti-inflammatory effects of two cannabinoid drugs, cannabidiol (CBD) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), in cultured cell lines and compared this effect with experimentally inflamed explant human colonic tissue. These effects were explored in acutely and chronically inflamed colon, using inflammatory bowel disease and appendicitis explants.
Caco-2 cells and human colonic explants collected from elective bowel cancer, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or acute appendicitis resections, and were treated with the following drug treatments: vehicle, an inflammatory protocol of interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα; 10 ng/ml), inflammation and PEA (10 µM), inflammation and CBD (10 µM), and PEA or CBD alone, CBD or vehicle were added simultaneously with IFNγ. Nine intracellular signalling phosphoproteins were determined by multiplex. Inflammatory cytokine secretion was determined using ELISA. Receptor mechanisms were investigated using antagonists for CB, CB, PPARα, PPARγ, TRPV1 and GPR55.
IFNγ and TNFα treatment increased phosphoprotein and cytokine levels in Caco-2 cultures and colonic explants. Phosphoprotein levels were significantly reduced by PEA or CBD in Caco-2 cultures and colonic explants. CBD and PEA prevented increases in cytokine production in explant colon, but not in Caco-2 cells. CBD effects were blocked by the CB antagonist AM630 and TRPV1 antagonist SB366791. PEA effects were blocked by the PPARα antagonist GW6471. PEA and CBD were anti-inflammatory in IBD and appendicitis explants.
PEA and CBD are anti-inflammatory in the human colon. This effect is not seen in cultured epithelial cells. Appropriately sized clinical trials should assess their efficacy.
我们试图量化两种大麻素药物,即大麻二酚(CBD)和棕榈酰乙醇胺(PEA)在培养细胞系中的抗炎作用,并将这种作用与实验性炎症状态下的人结肠外植体组织进行比较。使用炎症性肠病和阑尾炎外植体,在急性和慢性炎症的结肠中探究这些作用。
从择期肠癌、炎症性肠病(IBD)或急性阑尾炎切除术中收集Caco-2细胞和人结肠外植体,并进行以下药物处理:溶剂对照、干扰素γ(IFNγ)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα;10 ng/ml)的炎症处理方案、炎症处理加PEA(10 μM)、炎症处理加CBD(10 μM),以及单独使用PEA或CBD,CBD或溶剂对照与IFNγ同时添加。通过多重检测法测定9种细胞内信号转导磷酸化蛋白。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)测定炎性细胞因子分泌。使用CB、CB、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α(PPARα)、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)、瞬时受体电位香草酸亚型1(TRPV1)和G蛋白偶联受体55(GPR55)的拮抗剂研究受体机制。
IFNγ和TNFα处理增加了Caco-2培养物和结肠外植体中的磷酸化蛋白和细胞因子水平。在Caco-2培养物和结肠外植体中,PEA或CBD显著降低了磷酸化蛋白水平。CBD和PEA可防止外植体结肠中细胞因子产生增加,但对Caco-2细胞无效。CBD的作用被CB拮抗剂AM630和TRPV1拮抗剂SB366791阻断。PEA的作用被PPARα拮抗剂GW6471阻断。PEA和CBD在IBD和阑尾炎外植体中具有抗炎作用。
PEA和CBD在人结肠中具有抗炎作用。在培养的上皮细胞中未观察到这种作用。适当规模的临床试验应评估它们的疗效。