Vergara Rodrigo C, Moënne-Loccoz Cristóbal, Maldonado Pedro E
Departmento de Neurociencia & Biomedical Neuroscience Institute, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de ChileSantiago, Chile.
Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago, Chile.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 12;11:454. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00454. eCollection 2017.
Thermal stress has been shown to increase the chances of unsafe behavior during industrial and driving performances due to reductions in mental and attentional resources. Nonetheless, establishing appropriate safety standards regarding environmental temperature has been a major problem, as modulations are also be affected by the task type, complexity, workload, duration, and previous experience with the task. To bypass this attentional and thermoregulatory problem, we focused on the body rather than environmental temperature. Specifically, we measured tympanic, forehead, finger and environmental temperatures accompanied by a battery of attentional tasks. We considered a 10 min baseline period wherein subjects were instructed to sit and relax, followed by three attentional tasks: a continuous performance task (CPT), a flanker task (FT) and a counting task (CT). Using multiple linear regression models, we evaluated which variable(s) were the best predictors of performance. The results showed a decrement in finger temperature due to instruction and task engagement that was absent when the subject was instructed to relax. No changes were observed in tympanic or forehead temperatures, while the environmental temperature remained almost constant for each subject. Specifically, the magnitude of the change in finger temperature was the best predictor of performance in all three attentional tasks. The results presented here suggest that finger temperature can be used as a predictor of alertness, as it predicted performance in attentional tasks better than environmental temperature. These findings strongly support that peripheral temperature can be used as a tool to prevent unsafe behaviors and accidents.
热应激已被证明会因精神和注意力资源的减少而增加工业生产和驾驶过程中出现不安全行为的几率。尽管如此,制定关于环境温度的适当安全标准一直是个主要问题,因为调节也会受到任务类型、复杂性、工作量、持续时间以及之前任务经验的影响。为了绕过这种注意力和体温调节问题,我们关注的是身体温度而非环境温度。具体而言,我们在一系列注意力任务过程中测量了鼓膜温度、额头温度、手指温度和环境温度。我们设定了一个10分钟的基线期,期间受试者被要求坐着放松,随后进行三项注意力任务:持续操作任务(CPT)、侧翼任务(FT)和计数任务(CT)。使用多元线性回归模型,我们评估了哪些变量是表现的最佳预测指标。结果显示,由于指令和任务参与,手指温度下降,而当受试者被要求放松时则没有这种情况。鼓膜温度或额头温度未观察到变化,而每个受试者的环境温度几乎保持恒定。具体来说,手指温度变化的幅度是所有三项注意力任务中表现的最佳预测指标。此处呈现的结果表明,手指温度可作为警觉性的预测指标,因为它在注意力任务中对表现的预测比环境温度更好。这些发现有力地支持了外周温度可作为预防不安全行为和事故的一种工具。