• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可塑注意力资源理论:对心理负荷不足对表现影响的一种新解释。

Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance.

作者信息

Young Mark S, Stanton Neville A

机构信息

Railway Safety, Evergreen House, London, England.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2002 Fall;44(3):365-75. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497709.

DOI:10.1518/0018720024497709
PMID:12502155
Abstract

This paper proposes a new theory to account for the effects of underload on performance. Malleable attentional resources theory posits that attentional capacity can change size in response to changes in task demands. As such, the performance decrements associated with mental underload can be explained by a lack of appropriate attentional resources. These proposals were explored in a driving simulator experiment. Vehicle automation was manipulated at 4 levels, and mental workload was assessed with a secondary task. Eye movements were also recorded to determine whether attentional capacity varied with mental workload. The results showed a clear decrease in mental workload associated with some levels of automation. Most striking, though, were the results derived from the eye movement recordings, which demonstrated that attentional capacity varies directly with level of mental workload. These data fully supported the predictions of the new theory. Malleable attentional resources theory suggests that future vehicle designers should employ their technology in driver support systems rather than in automation to replace the driver. The implications of this theory are discussed with regard to capacity models of attention as well as to the design of future vehicle systems.

摘要

本文提出了一种新理论来解释负荷不足对绩效的影响。可塑注意力资源理论假定,注意力容量会根据任务需求的变化而改变大小。因此,与心理负荷不足相关的绩效下降可以用缺乏适当的注意力资源来解释。这些提议在一项驾驶模拟器实验中得到了探究。车辆自动化程度被设置为4个水平,并通过一项次要任务来评估心理负荷。还记录了眼动情况,以确定注意力容量是否随心理负荷而变化。结果显示,与某些自动化水平相关的心理负荷明显下降。不过,最引人注目的是眼动记录得出的结果,这些结果表明注意力容量与心理负荷水平直接相关。这些数据充分支持了新理论的预测。可塑注意力资源理论表明,未来的车辆设计师应将其技术应用于驾驶员支持系统,而非用于自动化以取代驾驶员。本文就该理论对注意力容量模型以及未来车辆系统设计的影响进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance.可塑注意力资源理论:对心理负荷不足对表现影响的一种新解释。
Hum Factors. 2002 Fall;44(3):365-75. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497709.
2
What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload.技能与此有何关系?车辆自动化与驾驶员心理负荷。
Ergonomics. 2007 Aug;50(8):1324-39. doi: 10.1080/00140130701318855.
3
Implications of task-induced fatigue effects for in-vehicle countermeasures to driver fatigue.任务诱发疲劳效应对于驾驶员疲劳的车内应对措施的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 1997 Jul;29(4):515-23. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00031-6.
4
Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance.任务诱发的疲劳状态与模拟驾驶性能。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Apr;55(2):659-86. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000505.
5
Commercial motor vehicle driving performance: An examination of attentional resources and control using a driving simulator.商用机动车驾驶性能:使用驾驶模拟器对注意力资源与控制的一项研究。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Jun;23(2):191-203. doi: 10.1037/xap0000120. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
Vehicle automation: a remedy for driver stress?车辆自动化:缓解驾驶员压力的良方?
Ergonomics. 2007 Aug;50(8):1302-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130701318830.
7
Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.高度自动化驾驶、次要任务表现与驾驶员状态。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):762-71. doi: 10.1177/0018720812442087.
8
Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance.驾驶时使用拥堵辅助系统;精神工作负荷和接受程度。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Nov;40(6):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
9
Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm.通过使用心理不应期范式来减轻车内干扰的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:1096-103. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
10
This Is Your Brain on Autopilot 2.0: The Influence of Practice on Driver Workload and Engagement During On-Road, Partially Automated Driving.这是你的自动驾驶大脑 2.0:在道路上部分自动驾驶期间,练习对驾驶员工作负荷和参与度的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Aug;66(8):2025-2040. doi: 10.1177/00187208231201054. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Return-to-Manual Performance in Lower- and Higher-Degree Automation.预测低程度和高程度自动化情况下恢复手动操作的能力
Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 27;67(9):187208251323101. doi: 10.1177/00187208251323101.
2
A narrative review of the interconnection between pilot acute stress, startle, and surprise effects in the aviation context: Contribution of physiological measurements.航空环境中飞行员急性应激、惊吓和惊奇效应之间相互联系的叙述性综述:生理测量的贡献
Front Neuroergon. 2023 Feb 23;4:1059476. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1059476. eCollection 2023.
3
Measuring Situational Cognitive Performance in the Wild: A Psychometric Evaluation of Three Brief Smartphone-Based Test Procedures.
在自然环境中测量情境认知表现:对三种基于智能手机的简短测试程序的心理测量评估
Assessment. 2024 Sep;31(6):1270-1291. doi: 10.1177/10731911231213845. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Group trust dynamics during a risky driving experience in a Tesla Model X.特斯拉Model X危险驾驶体验中的群体信任动态
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1129369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129369. eCollection 2023.
5
The effect of incentivization on the conjunction fallacy in judgments: a meta-analysis.激励对判断中合取谬误的影响:一项元分析。
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2336-2344. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01837-5. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Multimodal interface and reliability displays: Effect on attention, mode awareness, and trust in partially automated vehicles.多模态界面与可靠性显示:对部分自动驾驶车辆的注意力、模式意识及信任的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 28;14:1107847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107847. eCollection 2023.
7
The Real-World Effects of Route Familiarity on Drivers' Eye Fixations at Urban Intersections in Changsha, China.中国长沙城市交叉口驾驶员路线熟悉度对其注视点的实际影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159529.
8
The Application of Electroencephalogram in Driving Safety: Current Status and Future Prospects.脑电图在驾驶安全中的应用:现状与未来展望。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:919695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919695. eCollection 2022.
9
Mental State Detection Using Riemannian Geometry on Electroencephalogram Brain Signals.基于脑电图脑电信号的黎曼几何法进行精神状态检测
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Nov 26;15:746081. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.746081. eCollection 2021.
10
Supervision of a self-driving vehicle unmasks latent sleepiness relative to manually controlled driving.自动驾驶车辆的监管相对于手动控制驾驶揭示了潜在的困倦。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92914-5.