Ruch Simon, Herbert Elizabeth, Henke Katharina
Department of Psychology, University of BernBern, Switzerland.
Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of BernBern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 12;8:1542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01542. eCollection 2017.
Common wisdom and scientific evidence suggest that good decisions require conscious deliberation. But growing evidence demonstrates that not only conscious but also unconscious thoughts influence decision-making. Here, we hypothesize that both consciously and unconsciously acquired memories guide decisions. Our experiment measured the influence of subliminally and supraliminally presented information on delayed (30-40 min) decision-making. Participants were presented with subliminal pairs of faces and written occupations for unconscious encoding. Following a delay of 20 min, participants consciously (re-)encoded the same faces now presented supraliminally along with either the same written occupations, occupations congruous to the subliminally presented occupations (same wage-category), or incongruous occupations (opposite wage-category). To measure decision-making, participants viewed the same faces again (with occupations absent) and decided on the putative income of each person: low, low-average, high-average, or high. Participants were encouraged to decide spontaneously and intuitively. Hence, the decision task was an implicit or indirect test of relational memory. If conscious thought alone guided decisions (= H), supraliminal information should determine decision outcomes independently of the encoded subliminal information. This was, however, not the case. Instead, both unconsciously and consciously encoded memories influenced decisions: identical unconscious and conscious memories exerted the strongest bias on income decisions, while both incongruous and congruous (i.e., non-identical) subliminally and supraliminally formed memories canceled each other out leaving no bias on decisions. Importantly, the increased decision bias following the formation of identical unconscious and conscious memories and the reduced decision bias following to the formation of non-identical memories were determined relative to a control condition, where conscious memory formation alone could influence decisions. In view of the much weaker representational strength of subliminally vs. supraliminally formed memories, their long-lasting impact on decision-making is noteworthy.
普遍认知和科学证据表明,做出明智的决策需要有意识的思考。但越来越多的证据表明,不仅有意识的思考,无意识的想法也会影响决策。在此,我们假设,有意识和无意识获取的记忆都会引导决策。我们的实验测量了阈下和阈上呈现的信息对延迟(30 - 40分钟)决策的影响。向参与者阈下呈现成对的面孔和书面职业,以便进行无意识编码。延迟20分钟后,参与者有意识地(重新)编码现在阈上呈现的相同面孔,同时呈现相同的书面职业、与阈下呈现的职业相符的职业(相同工资类别)或不相符的职业(相反工资类别)。为了测量决策,参与者再次查看相同的面孔(不显示职业),并决定每个人的假定收入:低、低平均、高平均或高。鼓励参与者自发且直观地做出决定。因此,决策任务是对关系记忆的一种隐性或间接测试。如果仅有意识的思考引导决策(=假设H),那么阈上信息应独立于编码的阈下信息决定决策结果。然而,情况并非如此。相反,无意识和有意识编码的记忆都影响了决策:相同的无意识和有意识记忆对收入决策产生了最强的偏差,而阈下和阈上形成的不相符和相符(即不相同)的记忆相互抵消,对决策没有偏差。重要的是,相对于仅有意识记忆形成就能影响决策的对照条件,相同的无意识和有意识记忆形成后决策偏差增加,不相同记忆形成后决策偏差减少。鉴于阈下形成的记忆与阈上形成的记忆相比,表征强度要弱得多,它们对决策的长期影响值得注意。