Mastropasqua Tommaso, Turatto Massimo
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy.
1] Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy [2] Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 10;5:12920. doi: 10.1038/srep12920.
The capacity of humans and other animals to provide appropriate responses to stimuli anticipating motivationally significant events is exemplified by instrumental conditioning. Interestingly, in humans instrumental conditioning can occur also for subliminal outcome-predicting stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether attention is necessary for subliminal instrumental conditioning to take place. In two experiments, human participants had to learn to collect rewards (monetary gains) while avoiding punishments (monetary losses), on the basis of subliminal outcome-predicting cues. We found that instrumental conditioning can proceed subconsciously only if spatial attention is aligned with the subliminal cue. Conversely, if spatial attention is briefly diverted from the subliminal cue, then instrumental conditioning is blocked. In humans, attention but not awareness is therefore mandatory for instrumental conditioning, thus revealing a dissociation between awareness and attention in the control of motivated behavior.
工具性条件作用体现了人类和其他动物对预示着具有动机意义事件的刺激做出适当反应的能力。有趣的是,在人类中,工具性条件作用也可以发生在阈下结果预测刺激上。然而,阈下工具性条件作用的发生是否需要注意力,目前尚不清楚。在两项实验中,人类参与者必须根据阈下结果预测线索,学会在避免惩罚(金钱损失)的同时获取奖励(金钱收益)。我们发现,只有当空间注意力与阈下线索对齐时,工具性条件作用才能在潜意识中进行。相反,如果空间注意力暂时从阈下线索上转移,那么工具性条件作用就会被阻断。因此,在人类中,工具性条件作用需要注意力而非意识,从而揭示了在动机行为控制中意识和注意力之间的分离。