Martín J, Padierna A, Loroño A, Muñoz P, Quintana J M
Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga s/n, Galdakao, 48960 Bizkaia, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Diseases Network-REDISSEC, 48960 Galdakao, Spain.
Department of Psychiatry, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga s/n, Galdakao, 48960 Bizkaia, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Diseases Network-REDISSEC, 48960 Galdakao, Spain.
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;45:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
The aims of this study were to analyse the quality of life (QoL) of a broad sample of patients with eating disorders (ED) and to identify potential factors that predict QoL.
This prospective cohort study involved 528 patients diagnosed with ED and treated over a 15-year period in the Eating Disorders Outpatient Clinic. Information on sociodemographic and clinical data were gathered. Patients completed five self-administered instruments: the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26); the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); the Short-Form 12 (SF-12); and the Quality of Life in ED-short form (HeRQoLED-s). Descriptive, univariate analyses and multivariate linear regression models were applied to identify factors associated with QoL.
Predictive variables for a low level of QoL in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) included antidepressant treatment (P=0.009), substance abuse disorder, (P=0.03) and other organic comorbidities (P<0.0001). For patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), they included osteoporosis (P≤0.0001), obesity (P=0.0004) or being a student (P=0.04). For patients with eating disorders not otherwise specified (EDNOS), they included anxiolytic treatment (P=0.003), having circulatory disease (P=0.001), more years since start of ED treatment (P=0.03) and living alone (P<0.0001).
We found a significant difference in QoL between the diagnostic ED groups. With regard to the variables predicting QoL in ED patients, the findings of this study suggest that organic or psychiatric comorbidities and some data of social normality might be more relevant to QoL in ED than age, type of compensatory behaviour, BMI or number of visits to hospital emergency department.
本研究旨在分析广泛的饮食失调(ED)患者样本的生活质量(QoL),并确定预测生活质量的潜在因素。
这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了528名在饮食失调门诊接受诊断和治疗达15年之久的ED患者。收集了社会人口统计学和临床数据信息。患者完成了五项自我管理的测评工具:饮食态度测试-26(EAT-26);饮食失调诊断量表(EDDS);医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS);简明健康调查量表12项(SF-12);以及饮食失调生活质量简表(HeRQoLED-s)。应用描述性、单变量分析和多变量线性回归模型来确定与生活质量相关的因素。
神经性厌食症(AN)患者生活质量低水平的预测变量包括抗抑郁治疗(P=0.009)、物质滥用障碍(P=0.03)和其他器质性合并症(P<0.0001)。对于神经性贪食症(BN)患者,这些变量包括骨质疏松症(P≤0.0001)、肥胖症(P=0.0004)或为学生(P=0.04)。对于未另行指定的饮食失调(EDNOS)患者,这些变量包括抗焦虑治疗(P=0.003)、患有循环系统疾病(P=0.001)、自开始ED治疗以来的年数更多(P=0.03)以及独居(P<0.0001)。
我们发现不同诊断的ED组之间生活质量存在显著差异。关于预测ED患者生活质量的变量,本研究结果表明,器质性或精神性合并症以及一些社会正常状态数据可能比年龄、代偿行为类型、体重指数或医院急诊科就诊次数与ED患者的生活质量更相关。