• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality Regulation? Access to High-Quality Specialists for Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries in California.质量监管?加利福尼亚州医疗保险优势受益人的高质量专科医生可及性
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 27;6:2333392818824472. doi: 10.1177/2333392818824472. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
3
No Association Between Medicare Advantage Providers' Network Restrictiveness and Star Rating Between 2013 and 2017: An Observational Study.2013年至2017年医疗保险优势计划提供商网络的限制程度与星级评定之间无关联:一项观察性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):412-419. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08938-w. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Restrictiveness of Medicare Advantage provider networks across physician specialties.医疗保险优势计划提供商网络在各医学专业的限制情况。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14308. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14308. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
5
Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务传统 Medicare 与 Medicare Advantage 受益人的家庭保健机构的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622.
6
Medicare Advantage Enrollment Update 2017.2017年医疗保险优势参保情况更新
Rural Policy Brief. 2017 Aug 1;2017(5):1-5.
7
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
8
Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare?改善医疗保险优势计划中的选择与竞争会成为医疗保险的未来吗?
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2015 Dec 1;18(2):151-168. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2015-0046.
9
The private health insurance choices of medicare beneficiaries: how much does price matter?医疗保险受益人的私人健康保险选择:价格有多重要?
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Dec;71(6):661-89. doi: 10.1177/1077558714556896. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Rural Medicare Advantage Market Dynamics and Quality: Historical Context and Current Implications.农村医疗保险优势市场动态与质量:历史背景及当前影响
Rural Policy Brief. 2016 Jul 1(2016 3):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing network adequacy standards for VA Community Care.制定 VA 社区护理网络充足标准。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):400-408. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13651. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Narrow Networks on the Individual Marketplace in 2017.2017年个人市场上的窄网络
LDI Issue Brief. 2017 Sep;21(8):1-6.
2
Networks In ACA Marketplaces Are Narrower For Mental Health Care Than For Primary Care.在 ACA 市场中,心理健康护理的网络比初级护理更窄。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1624-1631. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0325.
3
Relation Between Narrow Networks and Providers of Cancer Care.窄网络与癌症护理提供者之间的关系。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 20;35(27):3131-3135. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.2040. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
Secret Shoppers Find Access To Providers And Network Accuracy Lacking For Those In Marketplace And Commercial Plans.暗访人员发现,对于参加市场医保计划和商业医保计划的人群而言,在联系医疗服务提供者以及医保网络准确性方面存在不足。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1160-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1554.
5
Effects of Narrow Networks on Access to High-Quality Cancer Care.窄网络对获得高质量癌症护理的影响。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):427-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6125.
6
Adequacy of Outpatient Specialty Care Access in Marketplace Plans Under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下医保市场计划中门诊专科护理可及性的充足性
JAMA. 2015 Oct 27;314(16):1749-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.9375.
7
Narrow Networks and the Affordable Care Act.窄网络与《平价医疗法案》
JAMA. 2015 Aug 18;314(7):669-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6807.
8
California hospital networks are narrower in Marketplace than in commercial plans, but access and quality are similar.加利福尼亚州医院网络在医保市场计划中的覆盖范围比在商业保险计划中更窄,但就医便利性和医疗质量相似。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May;34(5):741-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1406.
9
Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards.自上而下和自下而上的医疗质量方法:监管和报告卡的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:477-97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

质量监管?加利福尼亚州医疗保险优势受益人的高质量专科医生可及性

Quality Regulation? Access to High-Quality Specialists for Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries in California.

作者信息

Haeder Simon F

机构信息

Department of Political Science, John D. Rockefeller IV School of Policy & Politics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 27;6:2333392818824472. doi: 10.1177/2333392818824472. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2333392818824472
PMID:30944846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6437327/
Abstract

Medicare Advantage enrollment has seen tremendous growth over the past decade. However, we know comparatively little about the experience of beneficiaries in the program. Our knowledge of Medicare Advantage provider networks is particularly limited. This article is one of the first major assessments of the issue. It seeks to answer 3 important questions. First, are Medicare Advantage plan networks made up of higher quality providers? Second, how significant are the network restrictions imposed by Medicare Advantage plans with regard to access to higher quality providers? And finally, how much provider choice are Medicare Advantage beneficiaries left with? To assess these questions, I utilize geospatial data and individual provider quality measures for cardiologists, endocrinologists, and obstetricians and gynecologists from California. I find that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries generally do well in large metropolitan areas compared to traditional Medicare. However, there are concerns for those in micropolitan and rural areas, and even those in standard metropolitan areas, at times. Crucially, the connection between provider quality and networks can only be fully understood when connected to assessments of provider access. These findings also raise questions about how we think about provider networks and the adequacy of current approaches to network regulation.

摘要

在过去十年中,医疗保险优待计划的参保人数有了巨大增长。然而,我们对该计划中受益人的体验了解相对较少。我们对医疗保险优待计划的医疗服务提供网络的了解尤其有限。本文是对该问题的首批重大评估之一。它试图回答三个重要问题。第一,医疗保险优待计划的网络是否由更高质量的医疗服务提供者组成?第二,医疗保险优待计划对获得更高质量医疗服务提供者所施加的网络限制有多严重?最后,医疗保险优待计划的受益人还剩下多少医疗服务提供者可供选择?为了评估这些问题,我利用了地理空间数据以及加利福尼亚州心脏病专家、内分泌学家、妇产科医生的个体医疗服务提供者质量指标。我发现,与传统医疗保险相比,医疗保险优待计划的受益人在大都市区总体表现良好。然而,对于那些生活在微都市和农村地区的人,甚至有时对于那些生活在标准大都市区的人来说,仍存在担忧。至关重要的是,只有将医疗服务提供者质量与网络评估联系起来,才能全面理解医疗服务提供者质量与网络之间的关系。这些发现也引发了关于我们如何看待医疗服务提供者网络以及当前网络监管方法是否充分的问题。