Suppr超能文献

营利性康复医疗机构与医疗保险受益人 30 天内非计划性再住院是否独立相关?

Is Profit Status of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Independently Associated With 30-Day Unplanned Hospital Readmission for Medicare Beneficiaries?

机构信息

Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):598-602.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of facility-level factors on 30-day unplanned risk-adjusted hospital readmission after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).

DESIGN

Study using 100% Medicare claims data, covering 269,306 discharges from 1094 IRFs between October 2010 and September 2011.

SETTING

IRFs with at least 30 discharges.

PARTICIPANTS

A total number of 1094 IRFs (N=269,306) serving Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) for 30-day hospital readmission.

RESULTS

Profit status was the only provider-level IRF characteristic significantly associated with unplanned readmissions. For-profit IRFs had a significantly higher RSRR (13.26±0.51) than did nonprofit IRFs (13.15±0.47) (P<.001). After controlling for all other facility characteristics (except for accreditation status because of its collinearity with facility type), for-profit IRFs had a 0.1% point higher RSRR than did nonprofit IRFs, and census region was the only significant region-level characteristic, with the South showing the highest RSRR of all regions (type III test, P=.005 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the inclusion of profit status on the IRF Compare website (a platform including IRF comparators to indicate quality of services). For-profit IRFs had a higher RSRR than did nonprofit IRFs for Medicare beneficiaries. The South had a higher RSRR than did other regions. The RSRR difference between for-profit and nonprofit IRFs could be due to the combined effects of organizational and regional factors.

摘要

目的

调查设施层面的因素对住院康复机构(IRF)出院后 30 天计划性调整后再住院的影响。

设计

本研究使用了 100%的医疗保险索赔数据,涵盖了 2010 年 10 月至 2011 年 9 月期间 1094 家 IRF 的 269306 例出院患者。

设置

至少有 30 例出院患者的 IRF。

参与者

共有 1094 家 IRF(N=269306)为医疗保险付费服务的受益人服务。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

30 天内再住院的风险标准化再入院率(RSRR)。

结果

盈利状况是唯一与计划性再入院显著相关的提供者层面的 IRF 特征。营利性 IRF 的 RSRR(13.26±0.51)明显高于非营利性 IRF(13.15±0.47)(P<.001)。在控制了所有其他设施特征(除了设施类型与认证状态之间的共线性而未控制认证状态之外)后,营利性 IRF 的 RSRR 比非营利性 IRF 高 0.1%,而人口普查区域是唯一显著的区域层面特征,南部地区的所有地区中 RSRR 最高(III 型检验,两者均 P=.005)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持将盈利状况纳入 IRF Compare 网站(一个包括 IRF 比较器以表明服务质量的平台)。对于 Medicare 受益人,营利性 IRF 的 RSRR 高于非营利性 IRF。南部地区的 RSRR 高于其他地区。营利性和非营利性 IRF 之间的 RSRR 差异可能是由于组织和区域因素的综合影响。

相似文献

4
Evaluating Hospital Readmission Rates After Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation.评估住院康复治疗出院后的住院再入院率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1049-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验