Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):828-838. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13667. Epub 2021 May 9.
To understand the effects of receiving vertically integrated care in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) on health care use and outcomes.
Medicare enrollment, claims, and IRF patient assessment data from 2012 to 2014.
We estimated within-IRF differences in health care use and outcomes between IRF patients admitted from hospitals vertically integrated with the IRF (parent hospital) vs patients admitted from other hospitals. For hospital-based IRFs, the parent hospital was defined as the hospital that owned the IRF and co-located with the IRF. For freestanding IRFs, the parent hospital(s) was defined as the hospital(s) that was in the same health system. We estimated models for freestanding and hospital-based IRFs and for fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) patients. Dependent variables included hospital and IRF length of stay, functional status, discharged to home, and hospital readmissions.
We identified Medicare beneficiaries discharged from a hospital to IRF.
In adjusted models with hospital fixed effects, our results indicate that FFS patients in hospital-based IRFs discharged from the parent hospital had shorter hospital (-0.7 days, 95% CI: -0.9 to -0.6) and IRF (-0.7 days, 95% CI: -0.9 to -0.6) length of stay were less likely to be readmitted (-1.6%, 95% CI: -2.7% to -0.5%) and more likely to be discharged to home care (1.4%, 95% CI: 0.7% to 2.0%), without worse patient clinical outcomes, compared to patients discharged from other hospitals and treated in the same IRFs. We found similar results for MA patients. However, for patients in freestanding IRFs, we found little differences in health care use or patient outcomes between patients discharged from a parent hospital compared to patients from other hospitals.
Our results indicate that receiving vertically integrated care in hospital-based IRFs shortens institutional length of stay while maintaining or improving health outcomes.
了解在住院康复机构(IRF)中接受垂直整合护理对医疗保健使用和结果的影响。
2012 年至 2014 年的医疗保险登记、索赔和 IRF 患者评估数据。
我们在接受来自与 IRF(母公司医院)垂直整合的医院(母公司医院)入院的 IRF 患者与来自其他医院入院的患者之间,估计了 IRF 内医疗保健使用和结果的差异。对于基于医院的 IRF,母公司医院被定义为拥有 IRF 并与 IRF 位于同一地点的医院。对于独立的 IRF,母公司医院被定义为属于同一医疗系统的医院。我们为独立和基于医院的 IRF 以及按服务收费(FFS)和医疗保险优势(MA)患者估算了模型。因变量包括医院和 IRF 的住院时间、功能状态、出院回家和医院再入院。
我们确定了从医院出院到 IRF 的 Medicare 受益人。
在具有医院固定效应的调整模型中,我们的结果表明,基于医院的 IRF 中的 FFS 患者从母公司医院出院时,其住院时间(-0.7 天,95%CI:-0.9 至-0.6)和 IRF 住院时间(-0.7 天,95%CI:-0.9 至-0.6)较短,再入院率(-1.6%,95%CI:-2.7%至-0.5%)较低,出院回家护理的可能性(1.4%,95%CI:0.7%至 2.0%)较高,且患者临床结局无恶化,与从其他医院治疗的患者相比。我们发现 MA 患者也有类似的结果。然而,对于独立的 IRF 患者,我们发现从母公司医院出院的患者与从其他医院出院的患者在医疗保健使用或患者结局方面几乎没有差异。
我们的结果表明,在基于医院的 IRF 中接受垂直整合护理可缩短机构住院时间,同时保持或改善健康结果。